. 2016 Feb 19;50(3):228–239. doi: 10.1007/s13139-016-0403-3

Table 4.

Comparison of FFBL conspicuity on PET/MRI versus PET/CT: visual analysis

Reader	A	B	A and B^a	A and/or B^b
PET/MRI	9	26	8^c	27^d
No difference	37	15	13^c	39^d
PET/CT	4	9	3^c	10^d

^aA and B column – FFBLs for which both readers gave the same conspicuity rating

^bA and/or B column – FFBLs for which either reader or both readers gave a particular conspicuity rating

^cNote: numbers in the A and B add to <50 FFBLs, as only lesions for which both readers reached the same assessment are included

^dNote: numbers in the A and/or B add to >50 FFBLs, as lesions for which readers had ‘partial disagreements’ are double-counted