Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 9;7:1134. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01134

Table 1.

Pruning wood weight as affected by nitrogen supply.

Years Scion/rootstock combination Nitrate supply Wood weight (g) YAN (mg N/L) Analysis of variance Wood weight (g) YAN (mg N/L)
2013 CS/RGM N– 187.50 ± 34.18 120.00± Years (Y) ***
N+ 242.50 ± 32.68 241.00± Treatment (T) * ***
CS/110R N– 164.50 ± 20.20 180.00± Variety (V) *** *
N+ 208.00 ± 14.94 252.00± Rootstock (R) ** NS
PN/RGM N– 155.00 ± 21.47 180.00± Y/T **
N+ 190.50 ± 10.92 215.00± Y/V ***
PN/110R N– 158.00 ± 15.31 164.00± V/R * NS
N+ 183.50 ± 11.07 223.00± T/V NS NS
2014 CS/RGM N– 298.00 ± 66.22 252.67 ± 45.79 Y/R NS
N+ 255.50 ± 60.23 410.33 ± 11.68 T/R NS NS
CS/110R N– 266.00 ± 60.45 295.67 ± 30.83 Y/T/V NS
N+ 266.11 ± 94.30 490.00 ± 26.00 Y/T/R NS
PN/RGM N– 179.00 ± 28.07 268.00 ± 07.21 Y/V/R NS
N+ 217.00 ± 26.10 518.00 ± 25.87 T/V/R NS NS
PN/110R N– 203.00 ± 44.11 260.33 ± 47.35 Y/T/V/R NS
N+ 197.50 ± 50.84 568.00 ± 47.29

Values are means of 3 independent replicates + SE. N−: 0.8 mM N; N+: 3.6 mM N. One factor (N treatment) Anova tests were made, as well as Tukey tests. For each rootstock/variety combination, a and b indicate significantly different values between N– and N+ treatment. ±Unique value. Statistical analyses were done using an analysis of variance with years (Y), rootstock (R), treatment (T), variety (V), and their interaction effects (ns, P > 0.05;

*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01;

***

P < 0.001).