Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD001218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub3

Ceccherelli 1992.

Methods Blinding: participants, statistician (information from author)
 Dropout/withdrawals: no dropouts mentioned in the publication (first author remembers that there were a limited number of participants dropping out from the study, but he did not document the exact number)
 Observation period: baseline unclear; treatment 10 weeks; follow‐up only in participants with good response
 Acupuncturists' assessments: GA similarly/70% ‐ BB differently/45%
Participants Number of participants included/analysed: 30?/30
 Condition: migraine without aura
 Demographics: mean age 40 years; 9 female, 6 male in acupuncture group; 15 female in sham group
 Setting: unclear, Italy
 Time since onset of headaches: 179 +/‐ 127 months (control group: 226 +/‐ 140)
Interventions Acupuncture points: BL 2, BL10, BL 60, GB 3, GB 20, GV 11, GV 20, LR 3, CV 13 Ex HN1, ST 8 (on non‐painful side)
 Information on acupuncturist: n = 1, trained 3 years
 DeChi achieved?: no information
 Number of treatment sessions: 10
 Frequency of treatment sessions: 1/week
 Control intervention: placebo acupuncture (complex procedure without real needling suggesting superficial anaesthesia to the patient)
Outcomes Method for outcome measurement: headache diary
 Primary outcome: at least 50% score reduction
 Other outcomes: headache hours, intensity
Notes Participants were not informed that they might get a placebo; unusual sham technique; sex differences between groups; no interpretable follow‐up data (only follow‐up of responders)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table (information from author)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Numbered envelopes, inclusion and random allocation by different persons (information from author)
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants were blinded. The sham procedures differed from true acupuncture but participants were not informed that they might get a placebo.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes up to 3 month after randomisation Unclear risk No dropouts mentioned. The author reports on request that there were a few participants who did not complete the study.
Incomplete follow‐up outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes later than 3 months after randomisation Unclear risk Follow‐up only performed in treatment responders
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Relevant outcomes reported