Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD001218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub3

Linde M 2000.

Methods Blinding: none
 Dropouts/withdrawals: substantial bias possible (16 of 39 participants dropped out/not included in analysis)
 Observation period: baseline 4 weeks; treatment 4‐6 weeks; follow‐up 12 weeks
 Acupuncturists' assessments: GA differently/45% ‐ BB differently/40%
Participants Number of participants included/analysed: 39/23
 Condition: migraine without aura (IHS)
 Demographics: mean age 41 years, 82% female
 Setting: Gothenburg Migraine Clinic, Sweden
 Time since onset of headaches: more than 20 years on average
Interventions Acupuncture points: GB40, GB14, DU20, LI4 and ST44 in all participants + additional points selected according to symptoms
 Information on acupuncturists: 1 experienced physiotherapist
 DeChi achieved?: yes
 Number of treatment sessions: 7‐10
 Frequency of treatment sessions: 1‐2 sessions/week
 Control intervention: no acupuncture
 All participants received pharmacological acute treatment as before the study
Outcomes Method for outcome measurement: diary
 Primary outcome: migraine days
 Other outcomes: attack frequency, medication use
Notes Pilot study hardly interpretable due to very high dropout rate; one patient in the acupuncture group had no migraine days during the baseline period and 26 during follow‐up; some additional information provided by authors (M Linde and C Dahlöf). The trial originally had a third arm (relaxation) but results were not reported and are not available.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number list
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Inadequate method, although bias seems unlikely (random list was openly accessible to the physician including the patient; this physician was, however, not involved further ‐ information from author)
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes up to 3 month after randomisation High risk 16/39 participants (9 acupuncture, 7 control) dropped out early or could not be analysed. Detailed description, no intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Incomplete follow‐up outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes later than 3 months after randomisation High risk See above
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Relevant outcomes reported