Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;2016(6):CD001218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub3

Weinschütz 1994.

Methods Blinding: participants
 Dropouts/withdrawals: unclear
 Observation period: baseline 6 weeks; treatment 8 weeks; follow‐up 12 months
 Acupuncturists' assessments: GA exactly the same way/95% ‐ BB differently/45%
Participants Number of participants included/analysed: 41?/41?
 Condition: migraine with or without aura (IHS)
 Demographics: mean age 38 years; 90% female
 Setting: pain outpatient department of a university hospital, Germany
 Time since onset of headaches: mean 18 years
Interventions Acupuncture points: up to 10 points chosen according to pain localization and modalities
 Information on acupuncturist: n = 1, experienced and qualified
 DeChi achieved?: yes
 Number of treatment sessions: 8 sessions of 15 minutes each
 Frequency of treatment sessions: 1/week
 Control intervention: sham acupuncture (superficial needling 1‐2 cm distant from true points)
Outcomes Method for outcome measurement: diary
 Primary outcomes: attack frequency and migraine hours
 (data mainly presented as responder rate evaluated by time‐series analysis)
Notes Possibly rigorous, but insufficiently reported (in spite of multiple publication); no information on whether there were dropouts/withdrawals; replication of Weinschütz 1993 (with additional needling of foot points)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No description
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participants were blinded, sham acupuncture with superficial needling of the same number of needles 1‐2 cm from true points without DeChi
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes up to 3 month after randomisation Unclear risk No statements on whether any attrition or exclusions from analyses occurred
Incomplete follow‐up outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes later than 3 months after randomisation Unclear risk See above
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Only responder data derived from single‐case statistics reported