Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 26;2016:4685246. doi: 10.1155/2016/4685246

Table 2.

Mean area of wound (mm2) and % wound contraction during excision wound model.

Days Day 0 (before treatment) 3 6 9 12 15 17
Group 1 (ethyl acetate) 229 ± 1.47 (0.00) 169.5 ± 2.10 (25.98) 90.25 ± 1.70 (60.58) 61.50 ± 1.84 (73.14) 19.50 ± 0.95∗∗ (91.48) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100)
Group 2 (n-butanol) 231.25 ± 3.30 (0.00) 147 ± 1.22∗∗ (36.43) 117.5 ± 1.04 (49.18) 48 ± 1.22∗∗ (79.24) 21 ± 2.41∗∗∗ (90.91) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100)
Group 3 (aqueous) 233.5 ± 5.89 (0.00) 171.5 ± 4.25 (26.55) 118 ± 3.36 (49.46) 109.5 ± 2.21∗∗ (53.10) 74.25 ± 1.93 (68.20) 28.50 ± 3.27∗∗∗ (87.79) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100)
Group 4 (cream) 228.25 ± 4.23 (0.00) 196 ± 2.94 (14.12) 140.75 ± 3.06∗∗ (38.33) 88 ± 1.22 (61.44) 59.5 ± 1.65∗∗ (73.93) 28.25 ± 1.18∗∗ (87.62) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100)
Group 5 (control) 229.25 ± 2.45 (0.00) 203.25 ± 2.49 (11.43) 118 ± 3.13 (48.52) 93.75 ± 3.75 (59.10) 84.5 ± 3.5 (63.14) 54 ± 4.08 (76.44) 30.5 ± 3.86 (86.69)
Group 6 (standard) 231.29 ± 4.73 (0.00) 148.25 ± 1.93∗∗ (35.89) 89.25 ± 2.28 (61.40) 44.25 ± 2.28 (80.86) 18.5 ± 2.72∗∗ (92) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100) 0.00 ± 0.00 (100)

Values are mean ± SEM (percent) of 4 rats in each group. P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗ P < 0.0001 compared to respective day control group (statistical analysis was done by one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons).