Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 30;10(9):2527–2535. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.970920

Table 3.

Factors potentially associated with HPV-vaccine uptake among 1,161 females aged 18–25 y, Germany 2012–13

Variable/Category HPV vaccination coverage (%) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age (years)      
 18–19 61.6 1 1
 20–22 62.5 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.2 (0.7–2.1)
 23–25 27.5 0.2 (0.2–0.3) 0.5 (0.2–1.0)
Region of residency      
 Eastern federal states 59.2 1 ns
 Western federal states 51.9 0.7 (0.5–1.0)  
Migrant background      
 No 54.3 1 ns
 Yes 51.2 0.4 (0.7–1.2)  
Education      
 Less than university access degree or still in education 48.9 1 ns
 University access degree 55.6 1.3 (1.0–1.6)  
Religion      
 Christian 55.8 1 ns
 Islamic 57.1 1.1 (0.6–1.8)  
 other 41.2 0.6 (0.2–1.5)  
 none 48.8 0.8 (0.6–1.0)  
HPV-vaccination recommended by physician      
 No 10.6 1 1
 Yes 78.0 29.9 (20.2–44.4) 33.3 (15.6–70.7)
Vaccinated against tetanus      
 No 18.5 1 ns
 Yes 54.9 5.4 (2.0–14.2)  
Level of being informed about HPV vaccines      
 less well/ poorly informed 35.0 1 ns
 Very well/well informed 68.4 4.0 (3.1–5.2)  
Actively sought information on HPV vaccination      
 No 37.4 1 ns
 Yes 62.9 2.8 (2.2–3.6)  
Convinced of HPV vaccine effectiveness      
 No1 15.0 1 1
 Yes2 60.5 8.7 (4.9–15.3) 4.0 (1.5–10.8)
Concerns of HPV vaccine severe side effects      
 No1 94.0 1 1
 Yes2 41.6 0.04 (0.03–0.1) 0.03 (0.01–0.06)
Feels adequately informed to opt for/against HPV vaccination      
 No1 28.1 1 ns
 Yes2 62.1 4.2 (3.0–5.8)  
Opinion that HPV-vaccination replaces cervical cancer screening      
 No1 56.9 1 ns
 Yes2 51.2 0.8 (0.6–1.1)  
Opinion that condoms protect against HPV, thus vaccination is not necessary      
 No1 65.4 1 1
 Yes2 28.6 0.2 (0.1–0.3) 0.2 (0.1–0.4)

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; ns, statistically not significant; 1 “I do not agree”; 2 “I strongly/somewhat/slightly agree.”