Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Aug 9;6:30692. doi: 10.1038/srep30692

Genetic characterization of cysteine-rich type-b avenin-like protein coding genes in common wheat

X Y Chen 1,2,3,*, X Y Cao 3,*, Y J Zhang 2, S Islam 2, J J Zhang 2, R C Yang 2, J J Liu 3, G Y Li 3, R Appels 2, G Keeble-Gagnere 2, W Q Ji 1,a, Z H He 4,b, W J Ma 2,c
PMCID: PMC4977551  PMID: 27503660

Abstract

The wheat avenin-like proteins (ALP) are considered atypical gluten constituents and have shown positive effects on dough properties revealed using a transgenic approach. However, to date the genetic architecture of ALP genes is unclear, making it impossible to be utilized in wheat breeding. In the current study, three genes of type-b ALPs were identified and mapped to chromosomes 7AS, 4AL and 7DS. The coding gene sequence of both TaALP-7A and TaALP-7D was 855 bp long, encoding two identical homologous 284 amino acid long proteins. TaALP-4A was 858 bp long, encoding a 285 amino acid protein variant. Three alleles were identified for TaALP-7A and four for TaALP-4A. TaALP-7A alleles were of two types: type-1, which includes TaALP-7A1 andTaALP-7A2, encodes mature proteins, while type-2, represented byTaALP-7A3, contains a stop codon in the coding region and thus does not encode a mature protein. Dough quality testing of 102 wheat cultivars established a highly significant association of the type-1 TaALP-7A allele with better wheat processing quality. This allelic effects were confirmed among a range of commercial wheat cultivars. Our research makes the ALP be the first of such genetic variation source that can be readily utilized in wheat breeding.

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the most important staple food worldwide. Its unique viscoelastic properties conferred by the storage proteins, glutenins and gliadins, account for its extensive use and multi-ethnic expressions in food preparation, reflected in a wide range of wheat-derived food products1,2. The glutenin polymers are composed of an elastic backbone, formed by high-molecular-weight (HMW) subunits, and the branches, formed by low-molecular-weight (LMW) subunits which are the main contributors to dough strength and elasticity. The monomeric gliadins, conferring dough tractability, interact with the polymeric glutenins by strong covalent and non-covalent forces3,4,5. The structural characteristics of proteins affect polymerization behavior through both the strategic positioning of generally conserved cysteine residues and the presence of glutamine-rich repetitive regions within the polypeptide chain5,6,7,8,9. Cysteines constitute only a small proportion of the amino acids of gluten proteins (about2%), yet are extremely important to the structure and functionality of gluten due to their capacity to form intra- and inter-chain disulfide bonds10. Non-covalent bonds (hydrogen bridges, ionic interactions, and hydrophobic bonds), characteristically formed by glutamines, are responsible for the aggregation and structural stability of gluten proteins and dough structure formation11,12.

Besides the typical gluten proteins, storage protein components also include LMW gliadins or globulins with a molecular weight below 30,000 dalton13,14,15. Most of these atypical gluten proteins fall into the categories of ALPs or proteins with sequences similar to the previously reported LMW gliadin monomers14,15. LMW gliadins differ from gliadins and glutenins in lacking repetitive domains, with only a short sequence of proline and glutamine residues present in the mature protein15. The existence of proteins related to LMW gliadins, and constituting a new family of grain prolamin proteins, has also been confirmed in barley16,17 and rye18. DuPont and co-workers described a protein isolated from wheat grains as ‘avenin-like’, based on partial amino sequences determined by mass spectrometry19. Similarly, Vensel and coworkers20 identified five avenin-like proteins in the proteome of albumins and globulins during early and late stages of grain development. Kan and coworkers reported two classes of cDNAs encoding two types of ALPs, namely type-a and type-b21. In a phylogenetic analysis of the prolamin superfamily, the ALP genes co-locate as a single cluster, with its closest neighbors being avenin of oats and the sulphur-rich proteins (α-gliadins, γ-gliadins, LMW subunits of glutenin). Furthermore, in the same study the authors observed that type-a ALPs contain 14 cysteine residues, among which eight cysteines form the characteristic conserved cysteine skeleton of the typical prolamins (similar to avenin, α-gliadins, γ-gliadins, and LMW subunits of glutenin)22. It is noteworthy that type-a ALPs can form seven intra-chain disulfide bonds, which is typical of monomeric LMW gliadins. Type-b ALPs contain two repetitive domains (R1, R2), each with eight cysteine residues in homologous positions to the cysteines of γ-gliadin and oats avenin protein. Type-b ALPs also exhibited some differences in cysteine distribution, with a total of 18 or 19 cysteine residues. In particular, Mamone and coworkers23 detected type-b ALPs in the glutenin fraction of durum wheat cultivar Svevo, while Kan and co-workers21 found that the two cysteines in the N-terminal domain are not conserved in various Aegilops species, hence suggesting that they could be involved in inter-chain linkages to polymeric subunits of glutenins. The identification of type-b ALPs was supported by the acquisition of sequences from a reasonable number of tryptic peptides matching the expected molecular weights and pI values23. The higher number of cysteines in type-b ALPs was expected to have a significant effect on folding and the arrangement of disulfide linkages, not only by stabilizing the molecular structure, but also by influencing glutenin polymer formation. Chen and coworkers24 predicted that type-b ALPs were capable of forming eight intra-molecular disulfide bonds, with three free cysteine residues involved in inter-molecular disulfide bond formation. They confirmed that type-b ALPs can notably perform as “chain branches”, increasing the probability of glutenin macro-polymer (GMP) formation and including other glutenin subunits24. Ma and coworkers overexpressed type-b ALPs in two transgenic wheat lines, resulting in a highly significant improve of dough mixing properties and provided strong evidence for their incorporation into gluten polymers25.

Until now, when selecting for dough and baking quality improvement, wheat breeders have mainly relied on the genetic variation underlying gluten proteins. The effect on dough mixing properties associated with ALPs represents a novel genetic effect that has not been utilized in a targeted way in wheat grain functionality breeding thus far. Marker-assisted selection targeting ALPs depends on both natural allelic variation of ALPs and their validated effects on dough mixing properties. The objectives of this study were to locate the type-b ALP coding genes, find the number of available alleles and quantify the allelic effects for each locus, and to develop allele-specific markers for wheat grain functionality breeding.

Results

Type-b ALP coding genes in Triticum aestivum

ALP specific primers were used to amplify the complete coding sequence of type-b ALP genes from the genomic DNA of 19 cultivars. The amplified products covering the start and stop codons were about 902 bp in length (Fig. 1). Nucleotide sequences highly similar (99%) to the previously reported type-b ALP gene sequence (Accession No. FJ529695) were obtained.

Figure 1. PCR amplification products of type b ALP genes from genomic DNA of 19 wheat cultivars (lines).

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

M DNA ladder 100 bp; 01, Chara; 02, Negative control; 03, Kauz; 04, Eagle Rock; 05, Gregory; 06, Living Stone; 07, Westonia; 08, Wyalkatchem; 09, Yitpi; 10, Chinese Spring; 11, Jimai0860229; 12, Jimai13P406; 13, Jimai13J492; 14, Jimai13J492; 15, Jimai13J394; 16, Jimai13J494; 17, Jimai13P414; 18, Jimai23; 19, Jimai24; 20, Jimai44.

Sequence alignment and analysis

The sequences of the amplified ALP genes were used to search the EnsemblPlants (http://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Info/Index) and the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) databases. The results showed that type-b ALP genes were transcribed at a high rate and consisted of a single uninterrupted exon. The results were consistent with previous studies26. In addition, the type-b ALP gene sequences were good matches to three surveyed sequences (Chinese Spring) on chromosomes 7DS (99%), 4AL (98%) and 7AS (97%).

Gene locations

Three pairs of specific primers were designed, targeting ALP genes on chromosomes 7AS, 4AL and 7DS to verify the blasted results (Table 1). These primers were tested across the entire set of Chinese Spring deletion lines. Results were consistent with the surveyed sequence databases and the chromosomal location of the gene products ALP-7A, ALP-4A and ALP-7D was confirmed (Fig. 2). We thus named the three ALP gene loci TaALPb-7A, TaALPb-4A, and TaALPb-7D, accordingly.

Table 1. Chromosome-specific primer sets for cloning type-b ALP genes.

Marker Primer sequences (5′-3′) Tm (°C) Product size (bp) Amplified target
ALP F: TGCCACACATGATGATGCATG 60 912 Full length
R:ATGAAGGTCTTCATCCTG GCTC
ALP-7A F: ATGCCAACATCAACAACCG 55 762 7A genome-specific
R: TAGTACGCACCACCAGGGTAA
ALP-4A F: TCGGACAATACCAACAACAG 55 777 4A genome-specific
R: TCTAGCATGCACCACTAGTGC
ALP-7D F: ATGAAGGTCTTCATCCTGGCT 58 805 7D genome-specific
R: CTAGCACGCACCACCAGT
Open in a new tab

Figure 2. Chromosome-specific type-b ALP amplification using Chinese Spring deletion lines.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

M DNA ladder 100bp; 01, 7A (deletion lines); 02, 7B (deletion lines); 03, 7D (deletion lines); 04, 7A (deletion lines); 05, 7B (deletion lines); 06, 7D (deletion lines); 07, 4A (deletion lines); 08, 4B (deletion lines); 09, 4D (deletion lines).

SNP and indel analyses

Genomic DNA of 19 cultivars was amplified using the primer pairs specific for ALP-7A, ALP-4A and ALP-7D, with each primer pair amplifying one single sequence across all cultivars. The full-length sequences at the three gene loci were either 855 or 858 bp, encoding proteins with 284 and 285 amino acid residues, accordingly. In addition, SNP and indel polymorphisms were discovered among the amplicons of different cultivars at loci TaALPb-7A and TaALPb-4A. Seven polymorphic sites were detected among the TaALPb-7Aamplicons, including one deletion (three bases) and six SNPs involving five transversions and one transition (Fig. 3). Eighteen polymorphic sites were detected among the TaALPb-4A amplicons, including seventeen SNPs involving14 transversions and 3 transitions, as well as one indel variant (Fig. 4). No variationwas found at the TaALPb-7D locus (Fig. 5). These results indicate that multiple alleles exist for TaALPb-7A and 4A while no or little genetic variation exists at the TaALPb-7D locus. Further comparison revealed that the TaALPb-7A gene had three alleles, designated TaALPb-7A1 (GenBank accession no. KU286147), TaALPb-7A2 (GenBank accession no. KU286148) (frequency 50.98%) and TaALPb-7A3 (GenBank accession no. KU286149) (frequency 49.02%) in the current study (Table 2), while TaALPb-4A gene had four alleles, TaALPb-4A1 (GenBank accession no. KU286150), TaALPb-4A2 (GenBank accession no. KU286151), TaALPb-4A3 (GenBank accession no. KU286152), and TaALPb-4A4 (GenBank accession no. KU286153). The TaALPb-7D (GenBank accession no. KU286154) locus did not show any allelic variation across the cultivars screened in this study. Analysis of the translated protein sequences revealed that the signal peptides at the N-and C-termini were rather conserved, with hardly any variation detected. The sequence differences occurred mainly in the repetitive region. Major variations were detected on 7AS and 4AL alleles. Among the 7AS alleles, TaALPb-7A1 andTaALPb-7A2encode mature proteins, while allele TaALPb-7A3 contained a stop codon (a SNP resulting in CAA→TAA codon change. Figure 3), leading to early termination of translation in 10 cultivars (Supplementary Figure 1). Anonymous silenced ALP genes have been previously reported27,28,29. In-frame stop codons were not detected for the 4AL alleles, although many variations occurred within the mature proteins (Supplementary Figure 2). In addition, 18 cysteine residues were detected in 7AS and 7DS ALPs. The 4AL ALPs contained 19 cysteine residues, exhibiting more cysteine residues than previously reported for endosperm-specific storage proteins.

Figure 3. Alignment of the type-b ALP gene sequences located on wheat chromosome 7AS.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SNPs/InDels are shown. Polymorphisms are represented by black box. Dashed (-) and Dots (.), respectively indicate identical and deletion nucleotides. 1, Chinese Spring; 2, Eagle Rock; 3, Jimai13J394; 4, Jimai13J409; 5, Jimai13J492; 6, Jimai13P406; 7, Jimai0860229; 8, Living Stone; 9, Westonia; 10, Wyalkatchem; 11, Jimai13J494; 12, Jimai13P414; 13, Jimai23; 14, Jimai24; 15, Jimai44; 16, Kauz; 17, Yitpi; 18, Gregory; 19, Chara.

Figure 4. Alignment of the type-b ALP gene sequences located on wheat chromosome 4AL.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

SNPs/InDels are shown. Polymorphisms loci are represented by black box. Dashed (-) and Dots (.), respectively indicate identical and deletion nucleotides. 1, Jimai13J492; 2, Kauz; 3, Jimai13J409; 4, Eagle Rock; 5, Chara; 6, Jimai13P406; 7, Jimai23; 8, Jimai24; 9, Jimai13J494; 10, Jimai13P414; 11, Yitpi; 12, Wyalkatchem; 13, Westonia; 14, Chinese Spring; 15, Gregory; 16, Living Stone; 17, Jimai44; 18, Jimai0860229; 19, Jimai13J394.

Figure 5. The type-b ALP gene sequences located on wheat chromosome 7DS.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

No SNPs/InDels are shown in 19 wheat cultivars. 1, Chinese Spring; 2, Eagle Rock; 3, Jimai13J394; 4, Jimai13J409; 5, Jimai13J492; 6, Jimai13P406; 7, Jimai0860229; 8, Living Stone; 9, Westonia; 10, Wyalkatchem; 11, Jimai13J494; 12, Jimai13P414; 13, Jimai23; 14, Jimai24; 15, Jimai44; 16, Kauz; 17, Yitpi; 18, Gregory; 19, Chara.

Table 2. Mixograph parameters investigated for active and silent alleles of TaALPb-7A.

  Mean ± SD
Mixograph Parameters Band type: 0 (Frequency: 49.02%) Band type: 1 (Frequency: 50.98%)
Midline Peak time (min) 2.32 ± 0.85 2.84 ± 1.63*
Midline Peak integral (cm2) 89.06 ± 35.15 107.49 ± 63.47
Midline Peak width (%) 17.36 ± 3.05 17.16 ± 3.56
Midline Time × width (%) 5.43 ± 2.22 7.03 ± 3.70***
Open in a new tab

Band type 0: silent alleles; Band type 1: active alleles.

*Difference significant at 5% probability level; ***Difference significant at 0.1% probability level.

In general, the type-b ALP proteins can be considered to be glutamine and proline-rich proteins, although less than gliadins and LMW glutenins, due to the lack of extensive repetitive sequences. At the same time, ALP proteins exhibited a conserved distribution of cysteines (Supplementary Figures 1 and 2), which are predicted to be able to form seven or eight intra-molecular disulfide bonds among the 18 or 19 cysteine residues. The remaining cysteines (at least two) may form inter-molecular disulfide bonds linking to adjacent storage protein subunits.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic relationship of the 42 cloned type b ALPs sequences was analyzed by applying UPGMA to the aligned complete coding sequences of all clones and wheat storage protein genes, as well as the reported ALPs of wheat-related species available from various databases (Table 3). As shown in Fig. 6, the cloned type-b ALP sequences clustered according to their chromosomal origin. The cloned ALP sequences were closest to the reported type-b ALP sequences of related species, followed by sequences corresponding to HMW-GS and LMW-GS, while ω-gliadin were the furthest in evolutionary terms (Fig. 6).

Table 3. The reported nucleotide sequences of the wheat storage protein sequences and ALPs sequences of related species for phylogenetic analysis.

Gene name Category GenBank accession No. Source
HMW-GS x-type GQ403045 Ae. markgrafii
y-type GQ403046 Ae. markgrafii
LMW-GS i-type AY453156 T. aestivum
s-type EU189088 T. aestivum
m-type AB062851 T. aestivum
Gliadin α-type EU401789 T. turgidum
GQ891682 T. aestivum
β-type DQ166376 T. aestivum
DQ166378 T. aestivum
γ-type FJ006600 T. aestivum
GQ871773 T. aestivum
ω-type AY591334 T. aestivum
GQ423430 T. aestivum
ALPs Type b EU096535 Ae. triuncialis
EU096544 Ae. juvenalis
EU096550 H. vulgare
EU096551 O. sativa
EF526510 T. aestivum
FJ529695 T. aestivum
EU096547 T. monococcum
EU096548 T. turgidum
Open in a new tab

Figure 6. Phylogenetic analysis of the cloned sequences of type-b ALPs.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Allelic effects

The fact that the TaALPb-7A locus has two types of alleles, active and silent, allowed us to study its allelic effects. Allele-specific PCR markers were designed to differentiate the two types of TaALPb-7A alleles and a total 102 wheat cultivars or lines were selected for quality testing and marker analysis (Fig. 7). Mixograph analyses were conducted to assess wheat dough strength using procedures published previously30,31,32,33,34. Significant allelic effect differences were detected bewteen the active and silent alleles of TaALPb-7A. The active allele was significantly associated with higher dough strength parameters, including Midline Peak Time (P < 0.0443), and Midline Time × Width (P < 0.0096) (Table 2). Meanwhile, the component of HMW-GS, protein content and gluten content of 102 wheat cultivars or lines were analyzed (see Supplementary Table 1). Results revealed that the HMW-GS alleles were randomly distributed between the allelic types. The favorable subunit Dx5 was found in 33% of the silent wheat lines and 29% in the active lines. No significant association was detected between the allelic types and grain protein content or gluten content (Table 4), indicating the high dough strength of the active allelic type is from the expression of TaALPb-7A.

Figure 7. PCR amplification products of AS-PCR marker for TaALP-7A.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

M DNA ladder 100bp; 01 to 11 lanes are PCR products of selected cultivars; 12, Negative control; presence of a band indicates TaALP-7A1 and TaALP-7A2, absence stands for TaALP-7A3.

Table 4. Statistical analysis of Mixograph and NIR parameters.

Allele Number of accessions Mean Protein Mean MTxW Mean MPW Mean MPI Mean MPT Mean Gluten
Active 52 11.68a 7.03a 17.16a 107.49a 2.84a 39.81a
Silent 50 11.98a 5.43b 17.36a 89.06a 2.32b 40.06a
Open in a new tab

(a and b indicate significance at P = 0.05).

Comparison of the active and silent alleles of TaALPb-7A at gene expression level

To further confirm the function of these two types of the TaALPb-7A alleles, comparison of gene expression between four Australian cultivars (Kauz, Yitpi, Gregory, and Chara) containing the active TaALPb-7A allele and another four wheat cultivars (Chinese Spring, Eagle Rock, Westonia, and Wyalketchem) containing the silent TaALPb-7A allele were conducted by using reverse transcription (RT) reaction followed by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Results revealed that the cultivars with the active allele give a normal gene expression, the ratios of expressed gene copy numbers between TaALPb-7A and actin ranged from 1:2.54 to 1:3.36 (Table 5), while the four cultivars with the silent allele had no gene expression.

Table 5. Comparison of the active and silent alleles of TaALP-7A at gene expression by ddPCR.

Cultivar TaALP-7A type Expressed gene copies Mean Actin expressiod copies Mean Actin/TaALP
Chinese spring 1 Silent — 0 189056 172763 0
Chinese spring 2 — 161358
Chinese spring 3 — 167877
Eagle rock1 Silent — 0 93603 92536 0
Eagle rock2 — 93141
Eagle rock3 — 90864
Westonia1 Silent — 0 99825 91934 0
Westonia2 — 75655
Westonia3 — 100321
Wyalketchem1 Silent — 0 20577 21489 0
Wyalketchem2 — 21837
Wyalketchem3 — 22054
Chara1 Active 12419 12648 38018 38794 3.07
Chara2 12921 43240
Chara3 12605 35123
Greygory1 Active 4872 4939 11761 12542 2.54
Greygory2 5766 15829
Greygory3 4179 10038
Kauz1 Active 4305 4111 6558 10865.4 2.64
Kauz2 4263 10443
Kauz3 3767 15595
Yitip1 Active 152806 147921 537329 497029 3.36
Yitip2 124735 521603
Yitip3 166223 432155
NTC1 — — — — — —
NTC2 — — — — — —
NTC3 — — — — — —
Open in a new tab

Discussion

Cysteine-rich wheat grain storage avenin-like proteins (ALPs) capable of forming intra-molecular disulfide bonds were discovered in recent years and are considered atypical gluten components of the wheat grain storage protein complement. However, the presence of similar low-molecular weight subunits in glutenins and gliadins has been reported in the 1970s35,36, and these seem capable of forming strong in vivo associations among themselves and with HMW-GS and LMW-GS, apparently by inter-chain disulfide bonds. ALPs make up about 1% of total endosperm proteins37. Contrary to the typical gluten proteins that are characterized by large repetitive central domains these non-traditional gluten proteins lack repeating sequences. In 2D gels, type-b ALPs migrate only slightly faster than the LMW glutenins, α-, or γ-gliadins, due to sequence duplication in the central domain (R1, R2), compensating to a large extent for the missing repeating sequence domain37,38. The unique properties demonstrated by type-b ALPs make them an ideal component of elastic disulfide-linked aggregates. In this study, phylogenetic analysis clearly showed that the type-b ALP sequences of common wheat clustered in the same class. The cloned sequences of the current study also clustered together, forming a small class of its own. Further, the sequences of type-b ALP genes indicated a genetic relationship to the unique C-terminal domains of gluten proteins (LMW-GS and gliadins) and are notable for the absence of significant repetitive domains of typical HMW-GS. Due to the great homology of ALP genes to gliadins and avenins, these genes might be primitive versions of earlier storage proteins predating development of the repetitive domains of the traditional gluten proteins. Alternatively, they might have evolved by losing the repetitive domains of the ancestral genes. Further work is needed to establish a clear evolutionary context for ALPs in relation to the traditional gluten proteins. It is noteworthy that almost all reported type-b ALP genes were derived from chromosome 7D, suggesting that the genes on chromosomes 7A and 4A in the current study were new discoveries. More importantly, the allelic effects identified in this study were attributed to the newly discovered 7A locus, representing a class of novel non-traditional gluten protein variation that can be readily utilized in breeding for wheat grain functionality. Our results confirmed that ALP genes belong to a multigene family, like other gluten proteins genes26,39,40,41. Cole and coworkers42 reported that the tetraploid forms (AABB) of wheat are actually heterogeneous for the diploid donors of the A and B genomes, which helps explain the genetic variability at the 7A and 4A loci. However, the addition of the D genome to the tetraploid ancestor of bread wheat, even though it occurred on several separate occasions, seems to have relied on the hybridization with a rather conservative Aegilopsspp genome42. We found no genetic variation at the 7D locus of type-b ALP genes in the lines and varieties investigated in this study.

Despite the potential of type-b ALP proteins to form intermolecular bonds, their low abundance and the absence of a repetitive domain might limit their ability to play a major role in determining dough functional properties, so further work is needed to establish the potential of individual ALPs for dough viscoelasticity improvement. Research conducted on transgenic type-b ALP wheat lines confirmed the presence of free cysteines capable of improving dough mixing properties by forming extra inter-chain disulfide linkages with glutenins (HMW-GS and LMW-GS)43. Future research on the expression of ALPs, aimed at providing a more detailed understanding of peptide chain interactions, disulfide bond arrangements, and tertiary structure formation will allow us to delve deeper into the molecular interactions with gluten proteins. Combination and association analysis using targeted allelic ALP combinations will shed further light upon the highly complex interactions due to the allelic composition of sulfur-rich proteins (γ- and α-gliadin, LMW-GS), as well as sulfur-poor proteins (ω-gliadins and HMW-GS).

Although many researchers have mentioned that type-b ALP genes of wheat belong to a multigenefamily26,39,40,41, there still remained a paucity of genetic information about the chromosomal location, number of loci and alleles, and allelic effects. The current study clearly identified the chromosomal locations of type-b ALP genes and the number of alleles at each locus for the first time. In this study, the three type-b ALP gene loci were mapped to chromosomes 7AS, 4AL and 7DS. Theoretically, due to the allohexaploid (AABBDD) nature of bread wheat, the three gene loci should be located on three homeologous chromosome locations (7AS, 7BS and 7DS). The reason for the unusual chromosomal locations can be found in the evolutionary relationships of wheat chromosome arms44,45,46,47, ie., a 4AL/7BS translocation, a pericentric inversion, and a paracentric inversion that took place in the tetraploid progenitor of hexaploid wheat48. This clearly provides a theoretical basis for the localization of the type-b ALP loci on 7AS, 4AL and 7DS. Common factors contribute to the different types of allelic variations, including natural evolution and artificial selection. In this study, the TaALP-7A1 allele was detected in five Chinese cultivars (lines) (Jimai13J494, Jimai13P414, Jimai23, Jimai24 and Jimai44), while the TaALP-7A2 allele came from four Australian cultivars (Kauz, Yitpi, Gregory and Chara). It is expected that new alleles may be discovered by expanding the number of lines and varieties screened. In addition, multilocus analyses of the experimental wheat lines have shown that striking, non-random associations of alleles develop over certain loci, i.e. the wheat lines develop a highly organized genetic structure featuring multilocus gene complexes. The frequency of functional alleles (50.98%) and the silent allele (49.02%) for TaALP-7A among eight type-b ALP alleles at three-locus combinations are found at equal levels in the tested wheat cultivars. This equal distribution of functional and non-functional alleles indicates that they could be used for marker-assisted screening for improved wheat flour processing quality. The occurrence frequency of the active TaALP-7A1 and TaALP-7A2 (50.98%) alleles underlines the potential utility of these alleles in wheat breeding programs.

The use of functional markers (FM) is especially important for the accurate discrimination of different alleles in marker-assisted selection (MAS)49,50. Thus far, 56 FM for processing quality traits are have been developed for 16 loci, with 62 alleles associated with HMW glutenins, LMW glutenins, polyphenol oxidase activity, lipoxygenase activity, yellow pigment content, kernel hardness, and starch properties50. These FMs play an important role in MAS-based breeding for improved wheat grain functionality. However, selection for wheat dough properties and breadmaking qualities has been limited to the genetic variability o gluten using the available HMW and LMW glutenin markers. The ALP allelic variation associated with dough quality discovered in the current study represents a class of novel natural genetic variation that has not been previously utilized in wheat breeding. The FM developed for the active 7AS allele can be efficiently applied to track this newly discovered variation. Important genetic and cytogenetic aspects of wheat grain functionality that still require our attention are how the expression of genes associated with dough processing properties (HMW-GS, LMW-GS, gliadins and ALPs) relates to the response of wheat storage protein accumulation to certain environmental and physiological processes.

Methods

Plant material and experimental design

All wheat lines used in the current study is listed in Table 6. Nineteen wheat cultivars from Australia and China were used to clone the type-b ALP genes. Field trial of 102 bread wheat cultivars (lines) with a randomized complete block design with 3 replications at the experiment station in Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China, in 2012 and 2013 (36°42′N, 117°4′E; altitude 48 m). Shandong has a humid subtropical climate with a mean annual rainfall of 700 mm and average maximum temperatures of over 34 °C during wheat growing season. Seeds were sown by 300 kernels per square meter in 4 × 6 m plots.

Table 6. Name and origin of 111 wheat cultivars and advanced lines.

Name Origin Name Origin Name Origin Name Origin
JimaiH101 CHINA JimaiT112 CHINA JimaiC70218 CHINA Jimai13J390 CHINA
JimaiH102 CHINA JimaiT118 CHINA JimaiC70223 CHINA Jimai13P406 CHINA
JimaiH105 CHINA JimaiT120 CHINA JimaiC70228 CHINA Jimai13J407 CHINA
JimaiH106 CHINA JimaiD101 CHINA JimaiC70231 CHINA Jimai13J408 CHINA
JimaiH107 CHINA JimaiD102 CHINA JimaiC70241 CHINA Jimai13J492 CHINA
JimaiH108 CHINA JimaiD103 CHINA JimaiC70245 CHINA Jimai13J424 CHINA
JimaiH109 CHINA JimaiD104 CHINA JimaiC70247 CHINA Jimai13J427 CHINA
JimaiH110 CHINA JimaiD105 CHINA JimaiC70285 CHINA Jimai13J394 CHINA
JimaiH111 CHINA JimaiD106 CHINA JimaiC70298 CHINA Jimai13J464 CHINA
JimaiH112 CHINA JimaiD107 CHINA JimaiC70321 CHINA Jimai13J467 CHINA
JimaiH113 CHINA JimaiD108 CHINA JimaiC70356 CHINA Jimai13J490 CHINA
JimaiH114 CHINA JimaiD109 CHINA JimaiC70361 CHINA Jimai13J492 CHINA
JimaiH117 CHINA JimaiD111 CHINA JimaiC70365 CHINA Jimai13J494 CHINA
JimaiH118 CHINA JimaiD113 CHINA JimaiC70373 CHINA Jimai13J495 CHINA
JimaiH120 CHINA JimaiD116 CHINA JimaiC70421 CHINA Jimai9088 CHINA
JimaiH122 CHINA JimaiD117 CHINA JimaiC70445 CHINA Jimai23 CHINA
JimaiH123 CHINA JimaiD118 CHINA JimaiC70459 CHINA Jimai24 CHINA
JimaiH124 CHINA JimaiD119 CHINA JimaiC70483 CHINA Jimai0860229 CHINA
JimaiH125 CHINA JimaiD120 CHINA JimaiC70509 CHINA Chinese Spring CHINA
JimaiT102 CHINA JimaiD121 CHINA JimaiT30005 CHINA Kauz AUSTRALIA
JimaiT103 CHINA JimaiD122 CHINA JimaiT40097 CHINA Eagle Rock AUSTRALIA
JimaiT104 CHINA JimaiD123 CHINA JimaiT40098 CHINA Chara AUSTRALIA
JimaiT105 CHINA JimaiD124 CHINA JimaiT40103 CHINA Wyalkatchem AUSTRALIA
JimaiT216 CHINA Jimai13P307 CHINA JimaiT40271 CHINA Gregory AUSTRALIA
JimaiT108 CHINA Jimai13P406 CHINA JimaiT40284 CHINA Living Stone AUSTRALIA
JimaiT109 CHINA Jimai44 CHINA JimaiT40362 CHINA Yitpi AUSTRALIA
JimaiT110 CHINA Jimai13P414 CHINA JimaiT40368 CHINA Westonia AUSTRALIA
JimaiT111 CHINA JimaiC70107 CHINA Jimai13J386 CHINA — —
Open in a new tab

Fertilizers of 120 kg N ha−1, 60 kg P2O5 ha−1, and 120 kg K2O ha−1 were applied to the soil prior to sowing, and another 120 kg N ha−1 was top dressed at jointing in accordance with local wheat farming practices. The soil contained 1.64 g kg−1 organic matter in both years. All other standard agronomical practices were adopted. Seeds were harvested and used for mixograph, HMW-GS and NIR analysis. The means values of two trials were taken for analysis.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Genomic DNA of 19 cultivars was extracted from 1-week-old seedlings by using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method51. Primers to amplify the full-length gene were designed based on the type-b ALP coding sequence from NCBI database (Accession No.FJ529695) (Table 2). The PCR conditions were set to 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 50 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated by 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis, and the expected fragments were purified from the gel using a Gel Extraction Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Subsequently, the purified PCR products were amplified using BigDye@version 3.1 terminator mix (Applied Biosystems) and submitted for Sanger sequencing at the Western Australia State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre. PCR and DNA sequencing were repeated three times to ensure the accuracy.

Chromosomal locations of type-b ALP genes

The EnsemblPlants (http://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Info/Index) and the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC) databases were used to analyze the obtained sequences. After blasting the obtained sequence from 19 cultivars against the databases, good matches were found on chromosomes 7DS, 4AL and 7AS. Based on this, three pairs of specific primers were designed for each chromosome using Primer V5.0 software (http://www.premierbiosoft.com) (Table 2). Chinese Spring deletion lines were then used to test the designed chromosome-specific primers and to verify the chromosomal locations.

Sequence analysis

The chromosome-specific primers were used to amplify the genomic DNA of 19 cultivars. The PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol and then the hybrid vector was transformed into competent cells of E. coli strain DH-5α. Plasmids were extracted using the Magic Mini Plasmid Prep kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the extracted DNA was amplified using BigDye@version 3.1 terminator mix (Applied Biosystems) for Sanger sequencing. The program Bioedit 7.0 was used for sequence analysis. Geneious® software (R7) was used for multiple alignment of the translated amino acid sequences and phylogenetic analysis.

Allele-specific marker development

Primers targeting the type-1 TaALP-7A allele were designed based on SNP/InDel information: F: 5′-TGCAGCAGCTTAGCAGCTGCCAT-3′; R: 5′-GCTGGT AGGCTGATCCACCGGA-3′. A total of 102 wheat cultivars and lines (Table 1) were screened using the allele-specific primers.

HMW-GS electrophoretic analysis

The HMW-GS protein for SDS-PAGE was extracted from wheat grains by using a modified method based on Singh et al.52. In detail, 500 μl of 55% (v/v) isopropanol was mixed with crushed individual kernels for 5 min through continuous vortexing, followed by incubation (30 min at 65 C), vortexing (5 min), and centrifugation (5 min at 10000 rpm). This step was repeated three times to completely remove gliadins. Add 600 μl of 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) buffer containing 10% (w/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.003% (w/v) bromophenol blue, and 5% β-mercaptoethanol. The samples were boiled for 2 hours and then centrifuged for 5 minutes at 10000 rpm, 15 ml of upper solution of each sample were loaded on to the gel. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE according to Jackson et al.53 using stacking separation gels containing 4% acrylamide, 0.3% bis acrylamide, 0.1% SDS, and 0.125 M Tris-HCL (pH 6.8), and 8.7% acrylamide, 0.3% bis acrylamide, 0.1% SDS, and 0.38 M Tris-HCL (pH 8.8). The bands of HMW-GS on SDS-PAGE were scored according to the nomenclature system described by Payne and Lawrence54.

Quality testing

A 10-gram mixograph (National Manufacturing Co., Lincoln NE) was used to evaluate wheat dough mixing properties, as described by Zhang and coworkers55. Mixograph Peak Time (MPT, min), Peak Integral (MPI, cm2), Peak Width (MPW, %), and Midline Time × Width (MT × W, min) were measured as the four parameters selected for evaluating the dough quality. The statistical significance of mixograph data was assessed performing T-tests using the SAS/STAT System software, Version 8.0 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NG)55. DA7200 near infrared apparatus (Perten, Swedish) was applied to analyze the protein content and gluten content following the manufacture’s suggestion.

RNA extraction and ddPCR

RNA was extracted from 2 mature wheat grains of the 8 cultivars: Kauz, Yitpi, Gregory, Chara, Chinese spring, Eagle rock, Westonia, and Wyalketchem using the Qiagen RNeasy mini kit. The TaALP-7A RNA was carried out using the SuperScript® II Reverse Transcriptase (Applied Biosystems), with the 3′ primer: 5′-GCTGGTAGGCTGATCCACCGGA-3′ for the active allele and 3′ primer 5′-GCTGGT AGGCTGATCCACCAGT-3′ for the silent allele. The ddPCR was performed in a QX200 ddPCR system (Bio-Rad). The forward primers were 5′-TGCAGCAGCTTAGCAGCTGCCAT-3′ for the active allele and 5′-TGCAGCAGCTTAGCAGCTGCCAG-3′ for the silent allele. The beta actin primers (F: 5′-AGAGCTACGAGCTGCCTGAC-3′; R: 5′-AGCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG-3′) were used as the reference gene in a separate ddPCR. The ratios of the expressed gene copies between actin and TaALP-7A were calculated.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chen, X. Y. et al. Genetic characterization of cysteine-rich type-b avenin-like protein coding genes in common wheat. Sci. Rep. 6, 30692; doi: 10.1038/srep30692 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep30692-s1.doc (361.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by Australian Grain Research & Development Corporation project UMU00043 and Seed Industry Project of Taishan Scholar, Yong Talents Training Program of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Footnotes

Author Contributions X.Y.C. performed the sequencing and RT-PCR experiments as well as wheat quality assessment and manuscript writing; W.J.M. conceived and designed the research; X.Y.C. conducted the data analysis and part of the gene sequencing work; Y.J.Z. performed part of the sequencing and RT-PCR experiments; J.J.Z. helped sequencing and RT-PCR experiments as well as provide the chromosomal assigning material; R.C.Y. performed part of the RT-PCR experiments; J.J.L. carried out field trials and quality assessment; G.Y.L. conducted the wheat quality assessment; H.Z.H. conducted the data analysis and part of field trials; W.Q.J. conducted part of the data analysis and field trials; R.A. performed the genomic data analysis; S.I. supervised the daily operation of the research; G.K.-G. conducted the genomic data analysis.

References

  1. Shewry P. R., Napier J. A. & Tatham A. S. Seed Storage Proteins: Structures’and Biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 7, 945–956 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shewry P. R. & Tatham A. S. Biotechnology of Wheat Quality. J. Cereal Sci. 73, 397–406 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  3. Shewry P. R. Wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1537–1553 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Payne P. I. Genetics of wheat storage proteins and the effect of allelic variation on bread-making quality. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 38, 141–153 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  5. Shewry P. & Tatham A. Disulphide bonds in wheat gluten proteins. J. Cereal Sci. 25, 207–227 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  6. Köhler P., Belitz H.-D. & Wieser H. Disulphide bonds in wheat gluten: further cystine peptides from high molecular weight (HMW) and low molecular weight (LMW) subunits of glutenin and from γ-gliadins. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 196, 239–247 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shewry P. R. & Tatham A. S. Disulphide Bonds in Wheat Gluten Proteins. J. Cereal Sci. 25, 207–227 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  8. Shewry P. R. & Tatham A. S. Disulphide bond in wheat gluten proteins. J. Cereal Sci. 25, 207–227 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  9. Shewry P. R. & Halford N. G. Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 947–958 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grosch W. & Wieser H. Redox Reactions in Wheat Dough as Affected by Ascorbic Acid. J. Cereal Sci. 29, 1–16 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  11. Wrigley C., Békés F. & Bushuk W. Gliadin and glutenin: the unique balance of wheat quality. (American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc (AACC) 2006). [Google Scholar]
  12. Schiraldi A., Piazza L., Fessas D. & Riva M. I. Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry from macromolecules to man. Vol. 4, 829–921 (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999).
  13. Salcedo G., Prada J. & Aragoncillo C. Low MW gliadin-like proteins from wheat endosperm. Phytochem. 18, 725–727 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  14. Anderson O. D., Hsia C. C., Adalsteins A. E., Lew E. L. & Kasarda D. D. Identification of several new classes of low-molecular-weight wheat gliadin-related proteins and genes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 307–315 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  15. Clarke B. C., Phongkham T., Gianibelli M. C., Beasley H. & Bekes F. The characterisation and mapping of a family of LMW-gliadin genes: effects on dough properties and bread volume. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106, 629–635 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Aragoncillo C., Sanchez-Monge R. & Salcedo G. Two groups of low-molecular-weight hydrophobic proteins from barley endosperm. J. Exp. Bot. 32, 1279–1286 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  17. Salcedo G., Sanchez-Monge R., Argamenteria A. & Aragoncillo C. Low-molecular-weight prolamins-purification of a component from barley endosperm. J. Agri. Food Chem. 30, 1155–1157 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  18. Rocher A., Calero M., Soriano F. & Mrndez E. Identification of major rye secalins as coeliac immunoreactive proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology. 1295, 13–22 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. DuPont F. M., Chan R., Lopez R. & Vensel W. H. Sequential extraction and quantitative recovery of gliadins, glutenins, and other proteins from small samples of wheat flour. J. Agri. Food Chem. 53, 1575–1584 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vensel W. H. et al. Developmental changes in the metabolic protein profiles of wheat endosperm. Proteomics. 5, 1594–1611 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kan Y. et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals differentially expressed storage protein transcripts in seeds of Aegilops and wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 44, 75–85 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  22. Shewry P. R., Jenkins J., Beaudoin F. & Mills E. C. The classification, functions and evolutionary relationships of plant proteins in relation to food allergens. Plant food allergens, 24–41 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  23. Mamone G., Caro S. D., Luccia A. D., Addeo F. & Ferranti P. Proteomic-based analytical approach for the characterization of glutenin subunits in durum wheat. J. Mass Spectrom. 44, 1709–1723 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen P., Li R., Zhou R., He G. & Shewry P. R. Heterologous expression and dough mixing studies of a novel cysteine-rich Avenin-like protein. Cereal Res. Commun. 38, 406–418 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma F. Y. et al. Overexpression of avenin-like b proteins in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) improves dough mixing properties by their incorporation into glutenin polymers. PloS one. 7, 1–11 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen P. et al. Cloning, expression and characterization of novel avenin-like genes in wheat and related species. J. Cereal Sci. 48, 734–740 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  27. Anderson O. D. & Greene F. C. The α-gliadin gene family. II. DNA and protein sequence variation, subfamily structure, and origins of pseudogenes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95, 59–65 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  28. Beier H. H. & Grimm M. Misreading of termination codons in eukaryotes by natural nonsense suppressor tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4767–4782 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Santos M. A., Moura G., Massey S. E. & Tuite M. F. Driving change: the evolution of alternative genetic codes. Trends in Genetics. 20, 95–102 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lorenzo A. & Kronstad W. E. Reliability of Two Laboratory Techniques to Predict Bread Wheat Protein Quality in Nontraditional Growing Areas1. Crop Sci. 27, 247–252 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  31. Martinant J. P. et al. Relationships Between Mixograph Parameters and Indices of Wheat Grain Quality. J. Cereal Sci. 27, 179–189 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  32. Khatkar B. S., Bell A. E. & Schofield J. D. A Comparative Study of the Inter-Relationships-Between Mixograph Parameters and Bread. J. Sci. Food Agr. 72, 71–85 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  33. Bordes J., Branlard G., Oury F. X., Charmet G. & Balfourier F. Agronomic characteristics, grain quality and flour rheology of 372 bread wheats in a worldwide core collection. J. Cereal Sci. 48, 569–579 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  34. Ohm J. B., Simsek S. & Mergoum M. Modeling of Dough Mixing Profile Under Thermal and Nonthermal Constraint for Evaluation of Breadmaking Quality of Hard Spring Wheat Flour. Cereal Chem. 89, 135–141 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. Bietz J. A. & Wall J. S. Wheat gluten subunits: Molecular weights determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Cereal Chem. 49, 416–430 (1972). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Payne P. I. & Corfield K. G. Subunit composition of wheat glutenin proteins, isolated by gel filtration in a dissociating medium. Planta. 145, 83–88 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dupont F. M., Vensel W. H., Tanaka C. K., Hurkman W. J. & Altenbach S. B. Deciphering the complexities of the wheat flour proteome using quantitative two-dimensional electrophoresis, three proteases and tandem mass spectrometry. Proteome Sci. 9–1186 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kasarda D. D. et al. Farinin: Characterization of a novel wheat endosperm protein belonging to the prolamin superfamily. J. Agri. Food Chem. 61, 2407–2417 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cassidy B. G., Dvorak J. & Anderson O. D. The wheat low-molecular-weight glutenin genes: characterization of six new genes and progress in understanding gene family structure. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 743–750 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  40. Sabelli P. A. & Shewry P. R. Characterization and organization of gene families at the Gli-1 loci of bread and durum wheats by restriction fragment analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83, 209–216 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson R. D., Bartels D., Harberd N. P. & Flavell R. B. Characterization of the multigene family coding for HMW glutenin subunits in wheat using cDNA clones. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67, 87–96 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Cole E., Fullington J. & Kasarda D. D. Grain protein variability among species of Triticum and Aegilops: quantitative SDS-PAGE studies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60, 17–30 (1981). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ma F. Y. et al. Transformation of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with avenin-like b gene improves flour mixing properties. Mol. Breed. 32, 853–865 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dvorák J. & Chen K. C. Distribution of Nonstructural Variation between Wheat Cultivars along Chromosome Arm 6Bp: Evidence from the Linkage Map and Physical Map of the Arm. Genetics. 106, 325–333 (1984). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Dvořák J., Terlizzi P. d., Zhang H. B. & Resta P. The evolution of polyploid wheats: identification of the A genome donor species. Genome. 36, 21–31 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Naranjo T., Roca A., Goicoechea P. G. & Giraldez R. Arm homoeology of wheat and rye chromosomes. Genome. 29, 873–882 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  47. Naranjo T. Chromosome structure of durum wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79, 397–400 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Devos K. M., Dubcovsky J., Dvořák J., Chinoy C. N. & Gale M. D. Structural evolution of wheat chromosomes 4A, 5A, and 7B and its impact on recombination. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91, 282–288 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Andersen J. R. Functional markers in plants. Trends in plant science. 8, 554–560 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu Y. A., He Z. H., Appels R. & Xia X. C. Functional markers in wheat: current status and future prospects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 1–10 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stacey J. & Isaac P. G. Isolation of DNA from plants. In Protocols for Nucleic Acid Analysis by Nonradioactive Probes. 9–15 (Humana Press, 1994). [Google Scholar]
  52. Singh N. K., Shepherd K. W. & Cornish G. B. A simplified SDS-PAGE procedure for separating LMW subunits of glutenin. J. Cereal Sci. 14, 203–208 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  53. Jackson E. A. et al. Proposal for combining the classification systems of alleles of Gli-1 and Glu-3 loci in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Genet Breed. 50, 321–336 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  54. Payne P. I. & Lawrence G. J. Catalogue of alleles for the complex loci, Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1, which code for high molecular-weight subunits of glutenin in hexaploid wheat. Cereal Res Commun. 11, 29–35 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang Y. et al. The gluten protein and interactions between components determine mixograph properties in an F6 recombinant inbred line population in bread wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 50, 219–226 (2009). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep30692-s1.doc (361.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES