Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Policy Anal Manage. 2016 Summer;35(3):509–532. doi: 10.1002/pam.21909

Table A10.

Impact of BIC on perceptions of school environment.

Question 2: I feel welcome in my school.
Question 3: Most of the adults I see at school every day know my name or who I am.
Question 6: My teachers encourage me to succeed.
Grade 6–8
Pre/post Cum days
Panel A: Question 2
 Post BIC adoption: school with <25% coverage  0.0099*
(0.0044)		  0.0030*
(0.0014)
 Post BIC adoption: school with >25% coverage, not full  0.0053
(0.0069)		  0.0008
(0.0017)
 Post BIC adoption: full school −0.0158
(0.0149)		 −0.0069
(0.0054)
Panel B: Question 3
 Post BIC adoption: school with <25% coverage  0.0168**
(0.0052)		  0.0036*
(0.0017)
 Post BIC adoption: school with >25% coverage, not full  0.0026
(0.0082)		 −0.0010
(0.0022)
 Post BIC adoption: full school −0.0045
(0.0094)		 −0.0024
(0.0023)
Panel C: Question 6
 Post BIC adoption: school with <25% coverage  0.0084**
(0.0031)		  0.0025*
(0.0010)
 Post BIC adoption: school with >25% coverage, not full  0.0039
(0.0043)		  0.0010
(0.0011)
 Post BIC adoption: full school −0.0112
(0.0071)		 −0.0035**
(0.0012)
Observations 1,015,889 1,015,889

Notes: Standard errors in parentheses, robust to clustering at the school level. All models include student covariates, grade, school, and year effects. Covariates include age, gender, race/ethnicity, low income status, LEP, immigrant, and special education status. Low income is measured by eligibility for free or reduced price meals or enrollment in a Universal Free Meal school. We exclude charter school students, students attending citywide special education schools (District 75) and students in schools where survey coverage is less than 50 percent.