Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Policy Anal Manage. 2016 Summer;35(3):509–532. doi: 10.1002/pam.21909

Table A3.

Impact of BIC on ELA and math achievement—models excluding lagged test score.

Grades 4–5
Pre-post
Grades 6–8
Pre-post
Grades 4–5
Cumulative days
Grades 6–8
Cumulative days
ELA Math ELA Math ELA Math ELA Math
Post BIC adoption: school with <25% coverage  0.0021
(0.0118)
 0.0062
(0.0147)
 0.0082
(0.0152)
 0.0168
(0.0191)
 0.0116**
(0.0045)
 0.0107
(0.0055)
 0.0106*
(0.0053)
 0.0170*
(0.0069)
Post BIC adoption: school with >25% coverage, not full −0.0106
(0.0200)
−0.0277
(0.0224)
 0.0037
(0.0181)
 0.0067
(0.0270)
 0.0054
(0.0052)
 0.0040
(0.0066)
 0.0082
(0.0042)
 0.0161**
(0.0061)
Post BIC adoption: full school −0.0126
(0.0351)
 0.0409
(0.0499)
−0.0190
(0.0283)
−0.0521
(0.0327)
 0.0081
(0.0131)
 0.0233
(0.0155)
−0.0017
(0.0060)
 0.0048
(0.0092)
Observations 783,933 798,018 1,182,336 1,204,078 783,933 798,018 1,182,336 1,204,078

Notes: Compare to Table 4 of the paper. Regression models exclude control for lagged test score.