Table 1.
Country | Time period | Population | <3 Years miss rate, n (%) | Positive predictive value, % (95% CI) | Sensitivity, % (95% CI) | Specificity, % (95% CI) | Study design |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Korea [6] | 2002–2005 | 765,813 | 1,093/3,498 (40) | 6.2 (6.0–6.4) | 69.0 (66.3–71.8) | 96.0 (95.8–96.2) | Screening |
Japan [7,8] | 1990–1995 | 51,411 | 188/730 (25.8) | 88.6 (69.8–97.6)a) | Retrospective |
CI, confidence interval.
It was calculated be incidence method in prevalence screening.