Table 1. Weights and relationships extracted from the literature-based MCDA by Stevens et al. 14 and applied to the Thailand dataset.
Weight | Relationship between the factor and HPAI H5N1 suitability | |
---|---|---|
Density of waterfowls | 0.3768 | Sigmoidal, monotonically increasing relationship between 0 and 1000 heads/km2 with constant risk thereafter. |
Density of chickens | 0.0385 | Quadratic relationship with highest risk associated with medium density of chickens (500–5000 heads/km2), and lowest risk associated with both low (0–500 heads/km2) and high (>5000 heads/km2) chicken densities. |
Human population density | 0.2472 | Positive linear relationship |
Proximity to roads | 0.1574 | Sigmoidal, monotonically decreasing relationship with greatest risk within 0–5 km of a road, decreasing risk thereafter and negligible risk after 60 km. |
Proximity to water | 0.1149 | Highest risk close (0–5 km) to open water and thereafter decreased in a sigmoidal, monotonic fashion with negligible risk after 10 km |
Proximity to rice | 0.0652 | Highest risk close (0–5 km) to areas suitable for rice growing and thereafter decreased in a sigmoidal, monotonic fashion with negligible risk after 10 km |