Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 18;113(31):8813–8818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601626113

Table S1.

Comparison between the L. pneumophila Paris wild-type strain and its lpp0148TAA mutant derivative by RNA-seq analysis

RNA-seq lpp0148TAA versus WT (fold change > 2; Padj < 0.01)
Feature Fold change Padj Name and/or function
lpp2554 10.54 3.6E-147 Hypothetical
lpp0872 7.99 2.0E-168 comEA
lpp0640 7.13 1.9E-208 comM
lpp2553 3.82 2.4E-50 radC
lpp2280 3.14 1.4E-41 comF
lpp2555 2.97 8.5E-51 lepB
lpp0639 2.86 1.8E-32 Hypothetical
lpp0873 2.51 1.6E-34 mreB
lpp0680 2.18 3.3E-13 comEC
lpp0851 2.08 8.8E-14 Hypothetical; transposase IS200 like
lpp1976 2.06 1.5E-14 Hypothetical; pilin homolog
lpp0712 −2.03 8.6E-11 Hypothetical
lpp0148 −3.96 2.1E-53 lpp0148 (ProQ/FinO domain)
lpp0149 −6.65 1.2E-85 Hypothetical

Total RNA from bacterial cultures grown to an OD600 of 0.8 at 37 °C was extracted, purified, and sequenced (Illumina). This was done three times for each strain. The number of reads was normalized, and the statistical significance (Padj) of the obtained enrichment was calculated as described in SI Materials and Methods.