| McFarlane et al., 2006 |
Nurse-led intervention for secondary prevention for IPV |
Settings: 1. Urban areas; 2. Primary care public health clinics; 3. Women Infants & Children clinics |
Dutton’s Empowerment Model—Designed to empower survivors of IPV to engage in safety behaviors |
Intervention & Control: 1.↓Threats of assault; 2.↓Assault; 3. ↓Risk for homicide; 4.↓Work harassment; 5.↓Safety behaviors |
1. Powered sample size (N = 360); 2. Randomization; 3. No blinding; 4. Fidelity to intervention not evaluated; 5.Contamination not addressed; 6. 89% Retention; 7. Bias: Unclear risk |
|
|
Inclusion criteria: 1.18–44 years old; 2. English or Spanish speaking |
Intervention included a March of Dimes brochure w/ 15-item safety plan; nurse counseling including anticipatory guidance, guided referrals, and supportive care |
|
|
|
|
Population: 1. Mean age– 30; 2. 59.6% Latina; 3. 50% foreign-born; 4. Low income; 5. Low education |
Intensity & Duration: One time 20 minute session |
|
|
| Olds el at., 2004 |
Nurse and paraprofessionals conducting home visits to examine whether home visits provided by paraprofessionals would be as effective as those delivered by nurses |
Settings: 1. Denver, Colorado; 2. Participants’ homes |
Paraprofessionals and nurses worked with mothers to improve and engage in more health-related behaviors—enhancing parenting skills, thinking about family planning and work-life, and improving relationships with family and friends |
Nurse-visited mothers: ↓Domestic violence |
1.Powered sample size (N = 690); 2. Randomization; 3. Blinding; 4. Fidelity checks; 5. 80% retention; 6. Bias: Low risk |
|
|
Follow-up participants 2 years after the end of the intervention; Medicaid eligible, pregnant women expecting their first live birth |
Intensity & Duration: Home visits during pregnancy and the first 2 years child’s life |
|
|
|
|
47% Mexican-American |
|
|
|
| Peragallo et al., 2012 |
Salud Educacion Protecion y Autocuidado (SEPA) Health, Education, Protection and Self-care to improve health and sexual health behaviors |
Community based |
Social-Cognitive Theory |
Intervention group: ↓IPV over one year |
1.Powered sample size (N = 548); 2. Randomization; 3. No blinding; 4. Fidelity checks; 5. 73% Retention; 6. Bias: Unclear risk |
|
|
Miami-Dade and Broward county, Florida |
Sessions covered HIV/AIDS in the Hispanic community, STIs, HIV/AIDS prevention (e.g., condom use), negotiation and communication with the partner, IPV and substance abuse. Groups took place in community sites easily accessible to participants. Role play, participatory sessions, videos and discussions were used to build skills |
|
|
|
|
Inclusion criteria: 1. Latina; 2. 18–50 years old; 3. Reported sexual activity in the last 3 months |
Intensity & Duration: 5 2-hr sessions |
|
|
|
|
Mean age: 38 year old |
|
|
|
| Wray et al., 2013 |
Mutual-violence intervention to decrease victimization and perpetration of IPV between couples |
No location provided |
The intervention included sessions about: relationship skills, emotional awareness skills, and parenting/co-parenting skills |
Intervention group: Men: ↓perpetration of physical assault, injury from female partner. Women: ↓physical assault and injury from male partner. |
1.Pilot study; 2. No randomization; 3. Fidelity checks; 4. Bias: High risk |
|
|
Inclusion criteria: 1. Court-mandated to treatment for IPV/DV; 2. English-proficient and co-parent to at least one child |
Intensity & Duration: 12 90- minute sessions |
Recidivism rate: 4% for intervention couples; 50% for control. |
|
|
|
Populations: Males: Mean age: 29, 65% Latino. Females: Mean age: 27, 55% Latina |
|
|
|
