Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Proteomics. 2016 Jun;13(6):609–626. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2016.1190651

Table 3.

Comparison of solid phase immunoadsorption, Combinatorial Peptide Ligand Libraries and hydrogel nanoparticles for separating urine proteins [22,23,25,105,107,129,166].

Solid Phase immunoadsorption Combinatorial Peptide Ligand Libraries Hydrogel nanoparticles
Separation method Subtraction Equilibration enrichment Enrichment/size exclusion
Protein interaction principles Antigen-antibody interaction Physicochemical interaction (including hydrophobic, van der Waals, hydrogen bonding) between complementary hexapeptides and proteins Hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions between the dye bait and protein
Affinity molecule Monoclonal or polyclonal antibody Hexapeptides or hexapeptides+Alcian blue dye Organic dyes
Acrylic acid
Vinylsulfonic acid
Size exclusion No No Yes
Thermo-reversible No No Yes
Low abundance protein enrichment Possible Yes Yes
Affinity Moderate (antibody dependent) Weak-Strong Strong
Specificity High Moderate Moderate (dependent on the class of dye used as the affinity bait)