Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Jul;20(7):915–919. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0833

Table 1.

Characteristics of enrolled children, RMP dose per kg of body weight, and administration by nasogastric tube on the day of pharmacokinetic evaluation by RMP formulation

Formulation Eremfat® RMP (n = 92)
median [IQR]
R-Cin® RMP (n = 54)
median [IQR]
P value
Age, years 1.97 [0.94–4.37] 0.88 [0.5–2.47] < 0.001
Weight, kg 11.48 [8.27–15.45] 8.37 [5.7–13.3] < 0.001
HIV-infected, n (%)* 5 (5) 6 (11) 0.217
Female, n (%) 43 (47) 17 (31) 0.070
Dose, mg/kg 14.95 [12.20–16.68] 16.51 [14.85–18.67] 0.002
Nasogastric tube, n (%) 14 (15) 26 (48) < 0.001
*

At the time of pharmacokinetic sampling, four children had not started antiretroviral treatment, one child was receiving an efavirenz-based regimen and the remaining children were on lopinavir/ritonavir with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

RMP = rifampicin; IQR = interquartile range; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus.