Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 27;116(2):503–521. doi: 10.1152/jn.00107.2016

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Modeled responses to pseudosynaptic currents compared with in vitro responses. A–E: current-step evoked responses of models with varying conductance densities. Different symbols represent models with different combinations of gKL and gNa. F: modeled neurons with gKL(as in A) fire more irregularly to EPSC event trains than do model neurons without gKL. G: among neurons with gKL (transient response), those with more gKL have higher CVs than those with less gKL.