Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 27;2016:5478086. doi: 10.1155/2016/5478086

Table 2.

Scores of each EBPQ item (N = 648).

Item Score (mean ± SD) Response patterns
% responding 1–4
Priority item rank
Practice
Critically appraising literature (3.76 ± 1.27) 75.2 1
Evaluating the outcomes of own practice (3.76 ± 1.40) 72.2 2
Sharing information with colleagues (3.98 ± 1.54) 64.7 3
Integrating evidence with expertise (4.11 ± 1.33) 63.9 4
Finding relevant evidence (4.30 ± 1.25) 61.1 5
Formulating clear questions (4.58 ± 1.11) 52.3 6
Attitudes
Making time in a work schedule for research (3.84 ± 1.29) 72.8 1
Welcoming questions on own practice (4.97 ± 1.31) 40.1 2
Changing practice due to evidence found (5.09 ± 1.26) 35.2 3
EBP is fundamental to professional practice (5.07 ± 1.28) 34 4
Knowledge/skills
Research skills (3.97 ± 1.17) 83.8 1
Critically analyzing evidence against set standards (3.79 ± 1.13) 75.3 2
Retrieving evidence (4.01 ± 1.01) 70.5 3
Determining the validity (close to the truth) of material (4.05 ± 1.05) 69.9 4
Converting information needs into a research question (3.76 ± 1.27) 68.4 5
Awareness of major information types/sources (4.11 ± 1.08) 65.7 6
Determining how useful (clinically applicable) material is (4.18 ± 1.01) 63.9 7
IT skills (4.20 ± 1.10) 63.1 8
Monitoring and reviewing practice (4.28 ± 1.00) 61.7 9
Applying information to individual cases (4.28 ± 1.10) 60.8 10
Identifying gaps in professional practice (4.35 ± 0.96) 58.2 11
Reviewing own practices (3.76 ± 1.27) 52.5 12
Disseminating new ideas about care to colleagues (4.58 ± 1.19) 50.5 13
Sharing ideas and information with colleagues (4.61 ± 1.16) 48.1 14

1 means never/poor; 7 means always/best.