Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jun 2;82(5):1851–1857. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.029

Table 2.

Impact of prognostic factors on overall survival and disease control

UVA
MVA*
Outcome Factor Dichotomization HR p value HR p value
OS pGTV (>32.79 vs. ≤32.79) 4.40 < 0.0001 3.74 0.0003
nGTV (>19.04 vs. ≤19.04) 1.68 0.07 0.99 0.97
T-stage (3–4 vs. 1–2) 2.25 0.004 1.46 0.2
N-stage (N2–3 vs. N0–1 3.39 0.005 3.44 0.0073
LF pGTV (>32.79 vs. ≤32.79) 6.01 0.004
T-stage (T3–4 vs T1–2) 2.59 0.03
RF nGTV (>19.04 vs. ≤19.04) 1.55 0.36
N-stage (N2–3 vs. N0–1) 6.98 0.055
DMF pGTV (>32.79 vs. ≤32.79) 3.03 0.0008 3.01 0.0008
nGTV (> 19.04 vs. ≤19.04) 1.78 0.64 NS NS
T-stage (T3–4 vs. T1–2) 1.33 0.36 NS NS
N-stage (N2–3 vs. N0–1) 9.42 0.002 9.24 0.002

Abbreviations: DMF = distant metastatic failure; HR = hazard ratio; LF = local failure; MVA = multivariate analysis; OS = overall survival; nGTV = nodal gross tumor volume; pGTV = primary gross tumor volume; NS = not significant; RF = regional failure; UVA = univariate analysis.

*

Variables with a p value ≤0.10 in univariate analysis were considered for initial multivariate analysis model with backward elimination.

p Values were significant.

Excluded from analysis because of insufficient number of events for MVA to be reliably run.