Table 4.
pGTV |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p value |
p value |
|||||
Author | Year | N | RT technique | Patients on CCRT | LC/LRC | DMFS |
Nathu et al. | 2000 | 114 | 3D-CRT | 11%* | 0.1 | – |
Mendenhall et al. | 2003 | 190 | 3D-CRT | 4% | 0.0892–0.9493 | – |
Keberle et al. | 2003 | 80 | 3D-CRT | NR | 0.19 | – |
Been et al. | 2008 | 79 | 3D-CRT/IMRT | 49% | 0.6244 | – |
Hermans et al. | 2001 | 112 | 3D-CRT | NR | 0.047 | |
Chao et al. | 2004 | 31† | IMRT | 55% | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Struder et al. | 2007 | 85† | IMRT | 75%‡ | <0.001 | – |
Present study | 2010 | 340 | IMRT | 95% | 0.004 | 0.0008 |
Abbreviations: 3D-CRT = three-dimensional conventional radiotherapy; CCRT = concurrent chemoradiotherapy; DMFS = distant metastasis–free survival; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiation therapy; LC = local control; LRC = locoregional control; NR = not reported; pGTV = primary gross tumor volume.
Patients underwent induction chemotherapy.
Subset of patients included in volumetric analysis.
CCRT rate is based on the total head-and-neck cancer cohort of 172 patients. Numbers in boldface type indicate p-values are statistically significant.