Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 10;6:30965. doi: 10.1038/srep30965

Table 1. Likelihoods obtained by comparing total range size cumulative curves to three different theoretical curves corresponding to the linear, sigmoid, and generalized logistic models.

Clade linear sigmoid generalized logistic best model
Desmoceratidae 2.337 7.935 8.082 generalized logistic
Auloporida 2.422 7.695 7.240 sigmoid
Cystiphyllida 2.296 7.724 7.121 sigmoid
Favositida 2.577 9.402 8.504 sigmoid
Stauriida 2.799 9.899 9.477 generalized logistic
Pterineidae 2.321 6.510 7.065 sigmoid
Athyridida 2.697 8.800 9.365 generalized logistic
Orthida 2.675 8.743 9.327 generalized logistic
Orthotetida 2.579 9.356 8.954 sigmoid
Productida 2.586 8.839 9.360 generalized logistic
Spiriferida 2.581 8.996 9.512 generalized logistic
Spiriferinida 2.655 9.684 9.087 sigmoid
Strophomenida 2.397 9.263 8.444 sigmoid
Cystoporida 2.393 8.439 7.355 sigmoid
Fenestrida 2.347 8.396 7.607 sigmoid
Rhabdomesida 2.325 5.947 6.731 sigmoid
Trepostomida 2.446 8.260 8.032 sigmoid
Bellerophontidae 2.272 8.186 7.975 sigmoid
Euomphalidae 2.252 6.749 7.569 sigmoid
Lophospiridae 2.328 8.773 7.845 generalized logistic
Proetidae 2.289 7.344 8.113 sigmoid

Comparisons were made by means of maximum likelihood estimation. Log-likelihoods are reported. The last column indicates the best fitting model based on AICc.