. 2014 Dec 12;3(4):302–321. doi: 10.3390/microarrays3040302

Table 7.

miRNA in agreement between arrays. Number (n) and proportion (%) of miRNAs lying in the different agreement intervals, estimated according to the measurement error model parameters estimated by setting λ = 1 and by estimating it via random effects models. Confidence intervals for the proportions were computed using the Clopper–Pearson exact method [39].

		$λ = 1$		λ Estimated
Sample	Comparison	$% (C I 95 %)$	n	$% (C I 95 %)$	n
	Agilent-Affymetrix	82.53 (79.75–85.08)	671	84.26 (81.57–86.70)	685
hREF	Illumina–Affymetrix	82.78 (80.01–85.31)	673	89.91 (87.64–91.90)	731
	Illumina-Agilent	97.79 (96.52–98.68) ^†	795	97.54(96.23–98.49) ^†	793
	Agilent-Affymetrix	74.17 (71.02–77.15)	603	78.84 (75.87–81.60)	641
A498	Illumina-Affymetrix	56.46 (52.97–59.90)	459	73.43 (70.25–76.44)	597
	Illumina-Agilent	95.45 (93.78–96.78)	776	96.31 (94.77–97.50)	783

^†: the platform pair is in agreement.