Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 25;32(28):3144–3155. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.4634

Table A3.

Additional Response Details

Study Year Local Therapy No. of Lesions PR
SD
PD
No. Definition Used No. Definition Used No. Definition Used
Heller et al* 1996 ECT 10 2 50% reduction in tumor volume 0 NA 5 “No effect”
Heller et al* 1996 ECT 2 0 50% reduction in tumor volume 0 NA 0 “No effect”
Sersa et al 2000 ECT 27 10 > 50% reduction in tumor volume 11 < 25% increase or < 50% reduction in tumor volume 3 > 25% increase in tumor volume
Rodriguez-Cuevas et al* 2001 ECT 13 8 As listed 0 NA 2 “No response”
Rodriguez-Cuevas et al* 2001 ECT 14 6 As listed 0 NA 0 “No response”
Rodriguez-Cuevas et al* 2001 ECT 2 2 As listed 0 NA 0 “No response”
Byrne et al 2005 ECT 53 5 > 50% reduction in tumor area 9 Did not meet criteria for CR, PR, or PD 5 > 25% increase in lesion size
Gaudy et al 2006 ECT 24 3 > 50% reduction in tumor area 3 Not meeting criteria for CR, PR, or PD 1 > 25% increase in tumor volume
Marty et al 2006 ECT 171 19 WHO 1997; > 50% reduction in diameter for ≥ 4 weeks 18 WHO 1997; ≤ 25% increase or < 50% reduction in tumor diameter 8 WHO 1997; > 25% increase in tumor diameter
Quaglino et al 2008 ECT 233 80 WHO 1997; > 50% reduction in tumor area for at least 4 weeks 17 WHO 1997; < 25% increase or < 50% reduction in tumor area 0 > 25% increase in tumor area
Matthiessen et al 2011 ECT 94 18 RECIST v1 2000; ≥ 30% decrease in target lesion 11 RECIST v1 2000; < 20% increase or < 30% decrease in target lesion 7 RECIST v1 2009; ≥ 20% increase in target lesion
Benevento et al 2012 ECT 142 24 RECIST v1 2000 11 RECIST v1 2000; SD + NC 0 RECIST v1 2000
Campana et al 2012 ECT 35 13 RECIST v1 2000 3 RECIST v1 2000 0 RECIST v1 2000
Kendler et al* 2013 ECT 50 0 RECIST 2009; ≥ 30% decrease in tumor area 23 < 20% increase or < 30% decrease in tumor area 22 ≥ 20% increase in tumor area or an absolute increase of 5 mm
Kendler et al* 2013 ECT 29 0 RECIST 2009; ≥ 30% decrease in tumor area 22 < 20% increase or < 30% decrease in tumor area 0 ≥ 20% increase in tumor area or an absolute increase of 5 mm
Sperduto et al 1991 PDT 20 9 > 50% reduction in measurable nodules or a complete clinical regression with residual microscopic disease 0 NA 7 “No response: < 50% response, no change, or progression of disease”
Cairnduff et al 1994 PDT 14 0 50% reduction in tumor size 0 NA 9 “No other responses were seen”
Baas et al 1996 PDT 20 3 As listed 0 NA 2 “No change”
Kaplan et al 1998 PDT 13 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA
Mang et al 1998 PDT 86 7 As listed 0 NA 0 NA
Overgaard et al 1985 RT 15 5 > 50% reduction in tumor area 0 < 25% progression or < 50% reduction in tumor area 0 > 25% progression of tumor area
Menendez et al 2009 RT 88 9 “Partial response” 27 “No change” 0 All lesions had either CR, PR, or SD
Cohen et al 1978 ILT 766 NA NA NA NA 119 Did not regress
Nathanson et al 1979 ILT 22 7 ≥ 50% decrease in diameters for minimum of 2 weeks 1 Listed as no change 11 ≥ 50% increase in diameters
Cascinelli et al 1993 ILT 47 NA NA NA NA 23 Did not have an “objective response”
Stewart et al* 1999 ILT 8 NA NA NA NA 6 “No response”
Stewart et al* 1999 ILT 15 NA NA NA NA 10 “No response”
Hoeller et al 2001 ILT 29 2 ≥ 50% reduction in size with no new lesions 10 < 25% increase in size or < 25% decrease in size 9
Stopeck et al 2001 ILT 7 3 > 50% regression of tumor size 1 ≤ 25% increase or ≤ 50% decrease in tumor size 1 > 25% increase in tumor size
Radny et al 2003 ILT 244 16 ≥ 50% tumor volume regression NA ≤ 25% increase or < 50% decrease in volume NA NA
Oratz et al 2003 ILT 237 21 > 50% decrease in sum of diameters 0 NA 7 “Progression”
Byrne et al 2005 ILT 19 1 > 50% reduction in tumor area 3 Did not meet criteria for CR, PR, or PD 10 > 25% increase in lesion size
Triozzi et al 2005 ILT 14 0 ≥ 50% reduction in volume 2 < 25% increase or < 25% decrease in volume 12 ≥ 25% increase in volume
Gonzalez et al 2006 ILT 16 4 > 50% reduction in tumor area 3 Not meeting criteria for CR, PR, or PD 3 > 25% increase in tumor volume
Kimata et al 2006 ILT 77 5 WHO; ≥ 50% reduction in area 18 WHO classification; < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 52 WHO; > 25% increase in size or new lesions
Gaudy et al 2006 ILT 5 4 Moderate to marked response: marked changes in one third or more of tumor cells 1 Mild response, mild changes in cancer cells or marked changes in less than one third of cancer cells 0 All had CR,PR, or SD
Dummer et al 2008 ILT 25 2 WHO; ≥ 50% reduction in size for ≥ 4 weeks 3 WHO; does not meet definition of CR, PR or PD 16 WHO; > 25% increase in size or new lesions
Hofmann et al 2008 ILT 5 0 NA 1 < 50% reduction in tumor area 3 > 20% increase in tumor area
Thompson et al 2008 ILT 26 3 RECIST JNCI 2000 7 RECIST JNCI 2000 6 NA
Bedikian et al 2010 ILT 255 11 RECIST JNCI 2000 32 RECIST JNCI 2000 80 NA
Weide et al 2010 ILT 894 6 ≥30% decrease in greatest single dimension 146 < 20% increase or < 30% decrease in greatest single dimension 38 ≥ 20% increase in greatest single dimension
Unger et al 1992 TT 24 3 “Partial remission” 8 “No change” 9 “Progressive disease”
Unger et al 1993 TT 52 10 WHO criteria 28 WHO criteria 13 WHO criteria
Terwogt et al 1999 TT 30 6 ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size for ≥ 4 weeks 10 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor size 7 ≥ 25% increase in tumor size
Smorenburg et al 2000 TT 18 4 WHO 7 7 WHO
Leonard et al 2001 TT 19 6 WHO 1979; ≥ 50% reduction in tumor area 7 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 4 ≥ 25% increase in tumor area
Eilender et al* 2006 TT 12 1 ≥ 50% decrease in tumor area 4 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 6 ≥ 25 increase in tumor area
Eilender et al* 2006 TT 5 2 ≥ 50% decrease in tumor area 0 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 3 ≥ 25 increase in tumor area
Eilender et al* 2006 TT 2 1 ≥ 50% decrease in tumor area 0 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 1 ≥ 25 increase in tumor area
Eilender et al* 2006 TT 4 2 ≥ 50% decrease in tumor area 0 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 2 ≥ 25 increase in tumor area
Eilender et al* 2006 TT 1 0 ≥ 50% decrease in tumor area 0 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 1 ≥ 25 increase in tumor area
Salazar et al 2011 TT 10 4 “Modified WHO criteria” 2 “Modified WHO criteria” 1 “Modified WHO criteria”
Florin et al 2012 TT 45 25 As listed: “partial response” 1 As listed: “stable disease” 0 As listed: “progressive disease”
Adams et al 2012 TT 10 2 > 50% reduction in tumor area 6 < 25% increase or ≤ 50 reduction in tumor area 2 ≥ 25% increase in tumor size
Plesnicar et al 1982 ILT + RT 19 1 “Incomplete reduction in volume of metastases” 0 NA 4 “Minimal or no response”
Lai et al 2003 TT + RT 7 3 > 50% reduction in tumor area ≥ 4 weeks 1 < 25% increase or < 50% decrease in tumor area 0 ≥ 25% increase in tumor area or new lesions in treatment field
Green et al 2007 TT + ILT 178 18 ≥ 50% reduction in largest diameter 53 Did not meet criteria for CR, PR, or PD 33 Subcutaneous: ≥ 20% increase in largest diameter
Cutaneous: any increase in size or pigmentation
Li et al 2010 TT + PDT 11 3 RECIST; ≥ 30% decrease in tumor area 0 < 20% increase or < 30% decrease in tumor area 0 ≥ 20% increase in tumor area or appearance of new lesions

Abbreviations: CR, complete response; ECT, electrochemotherapy; ILT, intralesional therapy; JNCI, Journal of the National Cancer Institute; NA, not available; NC, no change; PD, progressive disease; PDT, photodynamic therapy; PR, partial response; RT, radiotherapy; SD, stable disease; TT, topical therapy.

*

Study split up by histology.

Systemic therapy allowed.

Response definition was not clearly stated, and we implemented the listed definition of response.