Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;28(9):e69–e76. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.02.009

Table 2.

Summary of D50 and k values and EQD2 values with 95% confidence interval for developing high-grade subjective xerostomia as scored by subjective scoring systems

Subjective xerostomia
LENTSOMA
Subjective xerostomia
RTOG
Combined superficial lobes
CLPS
D50 (Gy; 95% confidence interval) 34.6 (30.6–38.8) 36.1 (27.0–45.1)
EQD2 D50 (Gy; 95% confidence interval) 35.8 (31.6–40.1) 37.3 (27.9–46.6)
k 4.6 (1.5–7.6) 2.9 (–0.2–6.2)



BSLPS
D50 (Gy; 95% confidence interval) 32.6 (24.3–41.1) 39.0 (29.5–48.5)
EQD2 D50 (Gy; 95% confidence interval) 33.7 (25.1–42.5) 40.3 (30.5–50.1)
k 3.3 (0.4–7.6) 3.2 (0.9–5.5)

CLPS, contralateral parotid sparing; BSLPS, bilateral superficial lobe parotid sparing.

LENTSOMA, Late Effects of Normal Tissue- subjective, objective, management analytical.

RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.