TABLE 3.
State | Initiation | Quantity | Distribution | Overall Restrictiveness | Changes Over Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alaska | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | |
Arizona | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
California | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
Colorado | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | Distribution changed from 4 to 3 in 2010 due to the addition of dispensaries. |
Connecticut | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
DC | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
Delaware | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
Hawaii | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
Illinois | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
Maine | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
Maryland | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
Massachusetts | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
Michigan | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
Minnesota | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Montana | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
Nevada | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | Distribution changed from 5 to 3 in 2013 due to added dispensaries. |
New Hampshire | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
New Jersey | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
New Mexico | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | |
New York | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Oregon | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | Distribution changed from 5 to 3 in 2013 due to added dispensaries |
Rhode Island | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | Distribution changed from 4 to 3 in 2009 due to the addition of dispensaries |
Vermont | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | Initiation changed from 2 to 3 in 2006 due to newly approved conditions. Distribution changed from 4 to 2 in 2011 due to the addition of dispensaries |
Washington | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 |