Table 1.
Means
|
Logistic Regression
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Violent (n = 96) | Non-violent (n = 276) | t-value | AOR | p | |
Childhood risk factors | |||||
Family socioeconomic status | −0.18 | 0.66 | 5.78*** | 0.42 | <.001 |
Peer-nominated aggression | .180 | .140 | 2.23* | 1.24 | .08 |
Logistic χ 2 (2) = 36.7, p <.001 | |||||
Childhood protective factors | |||||
Family’s religious attendance | 2.00 | 2.36 | 2.03* | 0.73 | .02 |
Quality of family interaction | 0.09 | 0.01 | 1.94† | 1.27 | .08 |
IQ | 96.31 | 99.05 | 1.57 | ns | |
Peer-nominated popularity | .202 | .234 | 1.68† | ns | |
Peer-nominated aggression anxiety | .13 | .150 | 2.36* | ns | |
Logisticχ 2 (2) = 9.4, p < .01 | |||||
Adolescent risk factors | |||||
Family socioeconomic status | 3.28 | 4.42 | 4.34*** | 0.52 | .001 |
Peer-nominated aggression | 0.14 | 0.06 | 3.99*** | 2.04 | <.001 |
Logisticχ2 (2) = 34.6, p < .001 | |||||
Adolescent protective factors | |||||
Religious attendance | 2.02 | 2.09 | 0.26 | ns | |
Depression | 57.17 | 56.87 | 0.16 | ns | |
Educational aspirations | 4.09 | 4.90 | 3.20*** | 0.66 | .01 |
Peer-nominated popularity | 0.13 | 0.17 | 2.33* | ns | |
Peer-nominated aggression anxiety | 0.03 | 0.07 | 3.77*** | .47 | .01 |
| |||||
Logisticχ 2 (2) = 19.8, p < .001 |
Notes: T tests were computed for each predictor variable. Ns range from 187 (educational aspirations) to 372 (peer-nominated measures from childhood) across analyses. The logistic regressions were computed by forward stepwise entry with p<=.10 required for entry. The ns for each respective analysis were: childhood risk (nV=78, nNV=240), childhood protective (nV =74, nNV =232) adolescent risk (nV =47, nNV =142), and adolescent protective (nV =47, nNV =140). AOR = adjusted odds ratio. V = violent. NV = non-violent.
p < .10.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.