Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jul 15;127(9):3042–3050. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.06.029

Figure 2. Effect of acquisition parameters on HFO detection.

Figure 2

Overall relative sensitivity sensitivity for each considered sampling rate (A) and anti-aliasing filter (AAF) position (B). The sensitivity is the proportion of HFOs detected at each setting in relation to the gold standard (5000 Hz sampling and 2000 Hz AAF). Error bars are the standard error on the mean. Note, the sensitivity reaches a nearly asymptotic limit for ≥2 kHz sampling rate and >500 Hz AAF.