Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Aug;58(8):828–832. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000806

Table 3.

Adjusted Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for being involved in a Crash for the Seven Groups of Cardiovascular Disease Risks.

Framingham 10-Year CVD Risk N (%) Number or drivers reporting having been in a DOT crash (%) Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Intervals
Lowest Risk (0%) 123 (15.4) 36 (29.3) 1.00 (Reference)
1-2% 149 (18.7) 47 (31.5) 1.14 0.67 1.94
3-5% 107 (13.4) 43 (40.2) 1.58 0.90 2.78
6-8% 108 (13.6) 41 (38.0) 1.30 0.73 2.29
9-12% 120 (15.1) 48 (40.0) 1.45 0.83 2.54
13-20% 122 (15.3) 60 (49.2) 2.06* 1.18 3.60
Highest Risk (21-30%) 68 (8.5) 33 (48.5) 2.00* 1.05 3.77
*

p<0.05 adjusted for gender, body mass index and cell phone use while driving in the city. There was a significant trend in increased risk for crash across the CVD risk groups (p= 0.0046).