Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;37(9):3282–3296. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23240

Table 2.

Performance comparison between our proposed learning framework and three other methods in eMCI classification

Method ACC AUC SEN SPE Youden F‐score BAC
PAC [Wee et al., 2015] 0.6271 0.6598 0.6552 0.6000 0.2552 0.6333 0.6276
PEC [Wee et al., 2015] 0.6610 0.6138 0.5517 0.7667 0.3184 0.6154 0.6592
STDN [Wee et al., 2015] 0.7966 0.7920 0.7586 0.8333 0.5920 0.7857 0.7920
HON 0.8644 0.9000 0.8621 0.8667 0.7287 0.8621 0.8644
FON 0.8814 0.9299 0.8621 0.9000 0.7621 0.8772 0.8810

The numbers marked bold indicate the best performance.