Table 2.
Associations between smoker’s status and sociodemographic characteristics by intention to quit smoking and quit attempts
Characteristics | High intention to quit smoking AOR (95% CI) |
Attempted to quit smoking AOR (95% CI) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
b Model 1 Overall sample (n = 1262) |
c Model 2 Dual users (n = 248) |
b Model 1 Overall sample (n = 1262) |
c Model 2 Dual users (n = 248) |
||
| |||||
Smoker Status | Only cigarettes | Ref | - | Ref | - |
a Dual user | 1.79 (1.27–2.54)*** | - | 1.70 (1.21–2.40)** | - | |
Gender | Male | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Female | 1.20 (0.91–1.56) | 0.92 (0.49–1.72) | 1.07 (0.81–1.42) | 1.23 (0.64–2.39) | |
Age | <35 years | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
35–54 years | 0.86 (0.61–1.22) | 0.79 (0.38–1.66) | 0.75 (0.52–1.07) | 0.60 (0.28–1.27) | |
>55 years | 0.99 (0.70–1.42) | 0.77 (0.35–1.68) | 0.76 (0.53–1.10) | 0.43 (0.20–0.96)* | |
Ethnicity | Non-Hispanic White | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Non-Hispanic Black | 1.81 (1.22–2.67)** | 1.88 (0.63–5.62) | 1.58 (1.06–2.35)* | 1.80 (0.68–4.76) | |
Others | 1.07 (0.73–1.57) | 0.47 (0.21–1.05) | 1.70 (1.15–2.51)** | 1.18 (0.51–2.73) | |
Education | High school education or less | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Some college/ vocational | 1.50 (1.12–2.00)** | 1.50 (0.76–2.97) | 1.01 (0.75–1.38) | 0.68 (0.33–1.39) | |
College graduate | 2.46 (1.61–3.77)*** | 4.74 (1.71–13.15)** | 1.54 (1.01–2.37)* | 2.75 (1.16–6.49)* | |
Annual Household Income | <$30 K | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
$30 to <60K | 1.27 (0.91–1.77) | 0.58 (0.26–1.29) | 0.91 (0.64–1.28) | 0.92 (0.41–2.07) | |
>$60K | 1.34 (0.93–1.93) | 0.54 (0.23–1.27) | 0.90 (0.61–1.31) | 0.59 (0.25–1.42) | |
General Health Status | Excellent/very good | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Good | 0.94 (0.69–1.29) | 0.98 (0.47–2.01) | 1.16 (0.84–1.60) | 1.07 (0.53–2.16) | |
Fair/poor | 0.79 (0.54–1.18) | 0.66 (0.28–1.59) | 0.80 (0.53–1.21) | 0.51 (0.20–1.32) |
p-value <0.05;
p-value <0.01;
p-value <0.001
Dual users were defined as those who were current cigarette smokers and current users of electronic nicotine delivery systems;
Model 1: Multivariable logistic regression among cigarette users and dual users;
Model 2: Multivariable logistic regression among dual users only