Table 2. Subgroup analyses relating work stress to type 2 diabetes by sex.
Type of work stress | Number of studies | RR | (95%CI) | P | Pheterogeneity | I2(%) | Pinteraction | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Job demands | 0.26 | |||||||
Total | 6 | 0.94 | (0.72–1.23) | 0.64 | 0.07 | 52.0 | 28–30 | |
Male | 3 | 0.82 | (0.52–1.28) | 0.38 | 0.03 | 72.0 | 28–30 | |
Female | 3 | 1.12 | (0.83–1.51) | 0.48 | 0.78 | 0 | 28–30 | |
Decision latitude/control | 0.03 | |||||||
Total | 6 | 1.16 | (0.85–1.58) | 0.36 | 0.03 | 59.0 | 28–30 | |
Male | 3 | 0.88 | (0.71–1.09) | 0.23 | 0.97 | 0 | 28–30 | |
Female | 3 | 1.64 | (0.99–2.72) | 0.05 | 0.11 | 56.0 | 28–30 | |
Job strain | 0.16 | |||||||
Total | 8 | 1.12 | (0.95–1.32) | 0.16 | 0.0009 | 61.0 | 26–28, 30, 31, 32 | |
Male | 4 | 0.88 | (0.59–1.33) | 0.55 | 0.003 | 71.0 | 26, 28, 30, 32 | |
Female | 4 | 1.22 | (1.01–1.46) | 0.04 | 0.25 | 28.0 | 27, 28, 30, 32 |
RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.