Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 11;11(8):e0160618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160618

Table 2. Time Difference Between the Groups After Implementation of MALDI-ToF and Short-Incubation Identification.

Conventional identification vs. MALDI-TOF identification (2012–2013) MALDI-TOF identification vs. SIMI (2013–2014) SIMI vs Conventional identification (2012–2014)
Average change Δhours P, (median2012,2013; U) Δhours P, (median2013,2014; U) Δhours P, (median2012,2014; U)
Time to initiate antibiotics 0.13 0.43, (8.23, 10.05; 447) 5.25 0.19, (10.05, 6.57; 423) 5.38 0.14, (8.23, 6.57; 161)
Time to Gram stain result 2.33 0.22, (26.94, 22.23; 677) 2.08 0.22, (22.23, 22.15; 392) 4.41 0.14 (26.94, 22.15; 403)
Time to initial identification 21.03 1.95E-05, (70.17, 47.47; 291) 17.75 2.48E-3, (47.47, 32.93; 230) 38.78 7.46E-07, (70.17, 32.93; 128)
Time to final identification 11.54 0.01, (84.67, 70.3; 495) 5.17 0.4, (70.3, 68.13; 427) 16.71 0.03, (84.67, 68.13; 331.5)
Time to antibiotic change 9.56 0.19, (66.98, 79.5; 40) 10.64 0.03, (79.5, 49.17; 35)_ 20.2 0.14, (66.98, 49.17; 27)
Length of hospital stay in days, (hours) 3.07 (73.68) 0.50, (293.23, 280.00; 659) 8.92 (214.08) 0.14, (280, 273.62; 301) 11.99 (288.00) 0.10, (293.23, 273.62; 326)

The impact on patient treatment are summarized to show how the implementation of the MALDI-ToF identification and the short incubation protocol effected different stages in the diagnostic and identification process of positive blood cultures.