Table 5. Provincial fixed cost autoregressive model results.
| Province | Model Type | ARIMA (p,d,q) | AR 1 | AR 2 | AR 3 | Drift | Intercept |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| British Columbia | Autoregressive with a constant value | (3,0,0) | 0.315 | -0.086 | -0.602 | - | 5.2 x107 |
| Alberta | Random Walk with Drift | (0,1,0) | - | - | - | 2.5 x106 | - |
| Saskatchewan | Random Walk with Drift | (0,1,0) | - | - | - | 1.6 x106 | - |
| Manitoba | Random Walk with Drift | (0,1,0) | - | - | - | 3.4 x105 | - |
| Ontario | Autoregressive with a constant value | (2,0,0) | 1.019 | -0.386 | - | - | 5.4 x107 |
| Québec | Random Walk with Drift | (0,1,0) | - | - | - | 1.1 x105 | - |
| Yukon | Random Walk with Drift | (0,1,0) | - | - | - | -2.5 x104 | - |
| Northwest Territories | Autoregressive with a constant value | (1,0,0) | 0.730 | - | - | - | 1.1 x107 |