Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Pathol. 2016 May 14;55:117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.04.017

Table 1.

Summary of studies on ERG status in HGPIN.

Reference % ERG+ HGPIN Method Tissue % with concurrent invasive cancer Geographic relationship between HGPIN and invasive cancer Concordance between HGPIN and invasive cancer for ERG status
Cerveira, 2006 (8) 21% (4/19) RT-PCR RP 100% (19/19) NS NS
Perner, 2007 (9) 19% (5/26) FISH RP (TMA) 100% (26/26) 100% of ERG+ HGPIN in “tight proximity” to cancer 80% (4/5) for ERG+ HGPIN
Furusato, 2008 (10) 14% (2/14) RT-PCR RP 100% (14/14) 36% (5/14) adjacent; 64% (9/14) distant NS
Mosquera, 2008 (11) 16% (23/143) FISH RP, Bx 87% (124/143) NS 73% (91/124)
Carver et al, 2009 (12) 10% (4/10) FISH RP (TMA) 100% (10/10) adjacent 100% (10/10)
Han, 2009 (13) 15% (5/33) FISH RP (TMA) 100% (33/33) Adjacent = <3 mm; away = >3 mm 75% (15/20) for HGPIN adjacent to ERG+ cancer; 0% (0/10) for HGPIN away from ERG+ cancer
Han, 2010 (14) 0% (0/16) FISH RP 100% (16/16) >3 mm NS
van Leenders, 2011 (15) 52% (11/21) IHC Bx 90% (19/21) Same slide 95% (18/19)
Yaskiv, 2011 (16) 29% (5/17) IHC Bx 100% (17/17) 71% (12/17) immediately adjacent to invasive carcinoma 100% (5/5) for ERG+ HGPIN
Gao, 2012 (17) 36% (59/162) FISH Bx 37% (61/162) with subsequent invasive carcinoma NS NS
He, 2012 (18) 5% (5/94) IHC Bx 38% (36/94) with subsequent invasive carcinoma NS NS
Tomlins, 2012 (19) 18% (12/68) IHC Bx 22% (15/68) Separate core 40% (6/15)
Liu, 2013 (20) 22% (4/18) IHC Bx 72% (13/18) Separate core NS
Lotan, 2013 (21) 13% (5/39) IHC RP 100% (39/39) 23 PIN <3mm from PCa and 16 PIN >3mm from Pca 57% (17/30)
Teng, 2013 (22) 7% (2/29) IHC RP (TMA) 100% (29/29) NS 100% (2/2) for ERG+ HGPIN
Teng, 2013 (23) 6% (4/69) IHC RP (TMA) 100% (69/69) NS NS
Verdu, 2013 (24) 0% (0/10) IHC RP (TMA) 100% (10/10) “Distant” 80% (8/10)
Park, 2014 (25) 11% (51/461) IHC Bx 37% (170/461) with subsequent invasive carcinoma NS NS
Taris, 2014 (26) 18% (10/57) IHC RP (TMA) 100% (57/57) NS NS
Lee, 2015 (27) 27% (12/45) IHC Bx 20% (9/45) Same core 100% (9/9)
Morais, 2015 (28) 0% (0/19) IHC Bx 0% (0/19) NA NA