Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 10;60:10.3402/fnr.v60.30468. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v60.30468

Table 2.

Background information about pupils and parents/caregivers participating in the ProMeal-study between October 2013 and May 2014 in Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden

Finland (n=187) Iceland (n=221) Norway (n=144) Sweden (n=161)




Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Pa
Age (years)a 10.7 0.3 10.6 0.3 10.5 0.3 10.6 0.3 <0.001
Body weight (kg)b 39.2 8.5 38.9 8.1 37.2 6.6 37.9 7.2 0.022
Height (cm)c 145 6.8 146 6.8 145 6.9 145 6.5 0.463
BMI (kg/m2)d 18.5 3.2 18.3 2.8 17.7 2.2 17.9 2.6 0.016
% % % %

Sex, girlse 52.0 49.0 56.0 51.0 0.472
Non-native pupils 2.0 7.0 5.0 0.028
Child live with both parents all the time 62.0 89.0 90.0 <0.001
Education parent 1f
 ≥10–12 y 38.5 32.0 27.0 34.0
 University degree 53.5 58.0 73.0 64.0 <0.001
 Other/none 8.0 10.0 0.0 1.0
Employed parent one (or other occupation)f 89.0 87.0 91.0 0.488
Body mass index classification
 Overweight 16.5 18.0 16.0 12.0 0.010
 Obesity 6.5 3.0 0.5 3.0
Child has a diet-related disease 13.0 7.0 11.0 6.0 0.067
Child has other chronic disease 17.0 15.0 11.0 9.0 0.123
Parents who estimate the child's health as goodg 98.0 94.0 89.0 0.002

The difference between the groups were compared with a Chi-Square test on categorical variables (the Fishers exact test was used for the variables in which the parents rate the child's health and BMI classification). One-way between-groups ANOVA with post-hoc tests was used to compare means of continuous variables. (In the present table, only P-values from the ANOVA are presented. P-values from post-hoc tests are presented in the text.)

a

Finland n=206, Iceland n=224, Norway n=208, and Sweden n=190.

b

Finland n=200, Iceland n=224, Norway n=209, and Sweden n=179.

c

Finland n=200, Iceland n=224, Norway n=210, and Sweden n=179.

d

Body mass index: Finland n=200, Iceland n=224, Norway n=209, and Sweden n=1,879.

e

Finland n=206, Iceland n=224, Norway n=210, and Sweden n=197.

f

Education degree and employment for the parent who filled out the questionnaire.

g

Parents were asked to rate their child's health on a visual analogue scale, 1–10. In the present paper, 8–10 on the VAS scale is defined as good health.

Bold P-values indicate a statistically significant difference between countries.