Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 28;111(3):438–447. doi: 10.1111/add.13222

Table 3.

Estimated size of the injecting population in Bristol in 2011: assessment of sensitivity of results to incorporation of covariates and source dependencies.

Log‐linear model Men 15–24 Men 25–34 Men 35–64 Women 15–24 Women 25–34 Women 35–64
Observed 66 638 1091 54 301 300
Covariate capture–recapture models
1. No covariates 110 (90, 130) 750 (680, 840) 980 (890, 1100) 70 (60, 80) 250 (220, 290) 180 (160, 220)
2. Gender, age 110 (80, 170) 710 (620, 840) 1010 (870, 1180) 70 (50, 120) 240 (200, 320) 190 (150, 260)
3. Gender, age, housing 130 (90, 210) 820 (690, 1010) 1140 (960, 1390) 80 (60, 150) 280 (220, 380) 220 (160, 300)
Extensions of model 3 to allow for source dependencies
4. Treatment × beedle 120 (80, 210) 830 (670, 1080) 1300 (1030, 1710) 90 (50, 180) 320 (230, 490) 280 (190, 450)
5. Treatment × CJIT 250 (130, 670) 970 (740, 1350) 1150 (900, 1540) 120 (60, 330) 250 (180, 390) 170 (120, 250)
6. Needle exchange × CJIT 90 (70, 150) 750 (620, 930) 1060 (890, 1300) 70 (50, 130) 300 (220, 430) 230 (170, 350)
7. Treatment × CJIT + needle x CJIT 190 (90, 870) 840 (620, 1250) 970 (770, 1320) 120 (60, 620) 270 (180, 490) 170 (120, 300)
Capture–recapture subject to constraints and accounting for mortality data
3. a Gender, age, housing 100 (80, 160) 800 (680, 970) 1220 (1100, 1460) 80 (60, 130) 340 (300, 440) 320 (300, 380)
4. a Treatment × needle exchange 100 (70, 160) 790 (670, 1000) 1300 (1110, 1640) 80 (60, 160) 350 (300, 490) 330 (300, 460)
5. a Treatment × CJIT 150 (90, 300) 870 (700, 1170) 1290 (1110, 1670) 130 (70, 240) 360 (300, 510) 320 (300, 390)
6. a Needle exchange × CJIT 90 (70, 120) 740 (650, 900) 1160 (1090, 1370) 70 (60, 120) 350 (300, 470) 320 (300, 410)
7. a Treatment × CJIT + needle x CJIT 100 (70, 250) 780 (650, 1060) 1180 (1090, 1480) 100 (60, 270) 370 (300, 550) 330 (300, 430)
Prevalence estimates from final selected model
Population 35100 39800 76200 35200 37700 73700
Prevalence 0.3% (0.2, 0.3) 1.9% (1.6, 2.3) 1.5% (1.4, 1.8) 0.2% (0.2, 0.3) 0.9% (0.8, 1.2) 0.4% (0.4, 0.6)

Estimates shown are posterior medians from Bayesian analyses with 95% credible intervals, rounded to the nearest 10. Models with an

a

are extensions of the corresponding capture–recapture (CRC) model to incorporate external data. Final estimates, from the best‐fitting model, are shaded. CJIT = Criminal Justice Intervention Team.