Table 3.
Log‐linear model | Men 15–24 | Men 25–34 | Men 35–64 | Women 15–24 | Women 25–34 | Women 35–64 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observed | 66 | 638 | 1091 | 54 | 301 | 300 |
Covariate capture–recapture models | ||||||
1. No covariates | 110 (90, 130) | 750 (680, 840) | 980 (890, 1100) | 70 (60, 80) | 250 (220, 290) | 180 (160, 220) |
2. Gender, age | 110 (80, 170) | 710 (620, 840) | 1010 (870, 1180) | 70 (50, 120) | 240 (200, 320) | 190 (150, 260) |
3. Gender, age, housing | 130 (90, 210) | 820 (690, 1010) | 1140 (960, 1390) | 80 (60, 150) | 280 (220, 380) | 220 (160, 300) |
Extensions of model 3 to allow for source dependencies | ||||||
4. Treatment × beedle | 120 (80, 210) | 830 (670, 1080) | 1300 (1030, 1710) | 90 (50, 180) | 320 (230, 490) | 280 (190, 450) |
5. Treatment × CJIT | 250 (130, 670) | 970 (740, 1350) | 1150 (900, 1540) | 120 (60, 330) | 250 (180, 390) | 170 (120, 250) |
6. Needle exchange × CJIT | 90 (70, 150) | 750 (620, 930) | 1060 (890, 1300) | 70 (50, 130) | 300 (220, 430) | 230 (170, 350) |
7. Treatment × CJIT + needle x CJIT | 190 (90, 870) | 840 (620, 1250) | 970 (770, 1320) | 120 (60, 620) | 270 (180, 490) | 170 (120, 300) |
Capture–recapture subject to constraints and accounting for mortality data | ||||||
3. a Gender, age, housing | 100 (80, 160) | 800 (680, 970) | 1220 (1100, 1460) | 80 (60, 130) | 340 (300, 440) | 320 (300, 380) |
4. a Treatment × needle exchange | 100 (70, 160) | 790 (670, 1000) | 1300 (1110, 1640) | 80 (60, 160) | 350 (300, 490) | 330 (300, 460) |
5. a Treatment × CJIT | 150 (90, 300) | 870 (700, 1170) | 1290 (1110, 1670) | 130 (70, 240) | 360 (300, 510) | 320 (300, 390) |
6. a Needle exchange × CJIT | 90 (70, 120) | 740 (650, 900) | 1160 (1090, 1370) | 70 (60, 120) | 350 (300, 470) | 320 (300, 410) |
7. a Treatment × CJIT + needle x CJIT | 100 (70, 250) | 780 (650, 1060) | 1180 (1090, 1480) | 100 (60, 270) | 370 (300, 550) | 330 (300, 430) |
Prevalence estimates from final selected model | ||||||
Population | 35100 | 39800 | 76200 | 35200 | 37700 | 73700 |
Prevalence | 0.3% (0.2, 0.3) | 1.9% (1.6, 2.3) | 1.5% (1.4, 1.8) | 0.2% (0.2, 0.3) | 0.9% (0.8, 1.2) | 0.4% (0.4, 0.6) |
Estimates shown are posterior medians from Bayesian analyses with 95% credible intervals, rounded to the nearest 10. Models with an
are extensions of the corresponding capture–recapture (CRC) model to incorporate external data. Final estimates, from the best‐fitting model, are shaded. CJIT = Criminal Justice Intervention Team.