TABLE. Evaluation of Partnership Success Factors and Prerequisites for the 2014 Uganda Costed Implementation Plan by Types of Relationships.
| Types of Relationships | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Factors | Within the CIP Task Force | Between CIP Task Force and TST | Between CIP Task Force and Consultation Participants |
| Factors with high presence across all 3 relationships | |||
| Partners’ willingness to adapt to meet partnership’s needs | High | High | High |
| Existence of partnership champions | High | High | High |
| Ability to meet performance expectations | High | High | High |
| Clear goals | High | High | High |
| Senior management support | High | N/A | High |
| Partner compatibility | High | High | High |
| Factors with low presence across all 3 relationships | |||
| Conflict (degree, frequency, conflict avoidance, dominating partner) | Low | Low | Low |
| Factors with mixed presence across the 3 relationships | |||
| Perception of partners’ tolerance for sharing power | Low | Medium | Low |
| Trust | High | Medium | Medium |
| Confidence in procedures | Low | Medium | Low |
| Ownership | High | High | Low |
Abbreviations: CIP, costed implementation plan; NA, not applicable; TST, technical support team.