Table 1.
Model 1: Direct effects of stress and NRQ | Model 2: Do direct effects vary by gender? | Model 3: Moderating role of negative quality on stress–BP link | Model 4: Does the moderating role vary by gender? | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Systolic BP, b | Systolic BP, b | Systolic BP, b | Systolic BP, b | |
Actor stress | −.62* | −.62* | −.56* | −.55* |
Partner stress | .44 | .34 | .25 | .20 |
Actor × partner stress | −.00 | −.06 | .01 | .06 |
Actor NRQ | −.07 | .22 | −.16 | −.22 |
Partner NRQ | −.22 | −.64 | −.33 | −.48 |
Actor × partner NRQ | 3.23*** | 3.40*** | 3.10** | 3.15** |
Actor stress × actor NRQ | .05 | .39 | ||
Actor stress × partner NRQ | −.73 | −.93 | ||
Partner stress × actor NRQ | .25 | .30 | ||
Partner stress × partner NRQ | 1.12* | .99* | ||
Actor stress × gender | −.16 | −.08 | ||
Partner stress × gender | .75** | .80** | ||
Actor stress × partner stress × gender | .33* | |||
Actor NRQ × gender | −.25 | −.30 | ||
Partner NRQ × gender | .55 | .26 | ||
Actor NRQ × partner NRQ × gender | −.13 | |||
Actor stress × actor NRQ × gender | −.22 | |||
Actor stress × partner NRQ × gender | .28 | |||
Partner stress × actor NRQ × gender | 1.10* | |||
Partner stress × partner NRQ × gender | −.39 | |||
−2 Log likelihood | 17,680.0 | 17,662.7 | 17,669.8 | 17,652.5 |
Change in likelihood | 20.4** | 17.3** | 10.2* | 17.3* |
Notes: BP = blood pressure; NRQ = negative relationship quality. Change in likelihood in Model 1 is based on comparison with a covariates-only model. Change in likelihood for Models 2 and 3 is change from Model 1. Change in likelihood of Model 4 is based on comparison with Model 3. To compare model fit across models, we restricted all four models to individuals with complete data on all predictors and covariates (N = 2,221).
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.