Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0160234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160234

Fig 1. Kernel density estimates for malaria related knowledge and attitude scores by district, Jimma, Jan 2014.

Fig 1

Overall, the density of knowledge score was lower as compared to the attitude score and in each district similar pattern was observed. This means despite low level of knowledge, the majority of the respondents had quite high favorable attitude towards malaria preventive measures (overall estimated mean = 91.5, Std Err = 0.6, 95% CI: 90.1–92.9%) towards malaria preventive measures. Generally, no single respondent scored less than 60% on the attitude scale. In contrast, there were respondents who had low level of knowledge (estimated mean = 62.2, Std Err = 0.7, 95% CI: 60.6–63.8%) on malaria and its preventive measures.