Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;37(8):1077–1083. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001111

TABLE 2.

Outcome variables

Five-year Follow-up Population (n = 57)
Outcome Test Group (n = 40) Control Group (n = 17) Statistical Analysis Between Groups
ISQ AUC 0–5 yra
 High 71.6 (SD 2.0; range, 65.6–75.8) 66.7 (SD 3.4; range, 61.0–71.8) p < 0.0001
 Low 69.9 (SD 2.0; range, 65.1–73.9) 64.9 (SD 3.3; range, 58.3–70.1) p < 0.0001
ISQ at 5 yrs
 High 72.1 (SD 2.2; range, 68–77) 67.4 (SD 4.0; range, 60–73) p < 0.0001
 Low 70.9 (SD 2.3; range, 66.0–75.0) 65.9 (SD 4.3; range, 57.0–71.0) p < 0.0001
Change in ISQ 0–5 yra
 High 2.03 (SD 2.55; range, −4 to 10) 2.25 (SD 4.95; range, −7 to 11) p = 0.64
 Low 3.69 (SD 3.6; range, −3 to 12) 4.06 (SD 4.89; range, −5 to 13) p = 0.59
Holgers at 5 yrs
 Grade 0 36 (90%) 9 (52.9%)
 Grade 1 3 (7.5%) 4 (23.5%)
 Grade 2 1 (2.5%) 4 (23.5%)
 Grade 3 0 0
 Grade 4 0 0 p = 0.0013b
Maximum Holgers 0–5 yra
 Grade 0 10 (25%) 2 (11.8%)
 Grade 1 22 (55%) 5 (29.4%)
 Grade 2 7 (17.5%) 9 (52.9%)
 Grade 3 1 (2.5%) 1 (5.9%)
 Grade 4 0 0 p = 0.015b
Implant Survival Population (n = 77)
Outcome Test Group (n = 52) Control Group (n = 25)
Implant loss 0–5 yra
 Including explantations 3 (6.1%) 2 (10%)
 Excluding explantations 2 (4.2%) 1 (5%)

a0–5 year included all measurements from surgery till 5-year follow-up for ISQ, and all measurements from first postoperative visit till 5-year follow-up for soft tissue reactions.

bWhen comparing Holgers 0–1 with Holgers 2–4 statistical analysis between groups results in p = 0.048 for Holgers at 5 years and p = 0.011 for maximum Holgers 0–5 yrs.

AUC indicates area under the curve; ISQ, implant stability quotient.