Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 9;111(3):480–491. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.07.001

Table 1.

Goodness of Fit of ENSEMBLE Structures to Experimental Constraints

Restraint Target Energy Term Target Energy Value Calculated Energy Value
K2 alone
RDC 14N 15.000 1.326
PRE 14N 1.733 0.964
ACCESS 1%N(low2+up2) 6.641 5.099
R2 r 5.050 3.699
δC′ NσN4 11.640 11.611
δCα NσN4 23.709 23.632
δCβ NσN4 9.944 9.490
δHN NσN4 1.414 1.146
δHα NσN4 1.130 0.110
K2 with SDS
RDC 14N 10.500 1.659
PRE 14N 1.402 1.108
R2 r 5.049 3.393
δC′ NσN4 8.266 6.575
δCα NσN4 6.269 6.197
δCβ NσN4 7.321 6.299
δHN NσN4 1.458 1.310
δHα NσN4 0.336 0.331

Target energy functions are defined by Marsh and Forman-Kay (53). ACCESS, accessible surface area; R2, transverse relaxation rate, δC′, carbonyl chemical shift; δCα, carbon chemical shift; δCβ, β-carbon chemical shift; δHN, amide proton chemical shift; δHα, α-proton chemical shift; N, value of the restraint; σN, average standard deviation of the restraint; r, correlation coefficient for fitting R2. Energy term units are arbitrary.