Table 2.
Combined imaging score, T2 mapping score, and T2 time by intervertebral disc level and age category
| Age (number) of sheep | ||||
| Combined imaging score | 0–1 y (n = 5) | 2–4 y (n = 8) | 5–7 y (n = 14) | 8–11 y (n = 11) |
| L1L2 | 0 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 1.7 |
| L2L3 | 0 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 1.7 |
| L3L4 | 0 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 1.6 |
| L4L5 | 0 ± 0 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 1.6 |
| L5L6 | 0 ± 0 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 1.8 ± 1.5 |
| L6S1 | 0 ± 0 | 4.4 ± 2.0 | 4.9 ± 1.6 | 7.7 ± 2.4 |
| T2 mapping score | 0–1 y (n = 5) | 2–4 y (n = 4) | 5–7 y (n = 5) | 8–11 y (n = 5) |
| L2L3 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 0.8 |
| L3L4 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.7 |
| L4L5 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 0.8 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.8 |
| L5L6 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.8 |
| L6S1 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.0 |
| T2 time | 0–1 y (n = 5) | 2–4 y (n = 4) | 5–7 y (n = 5) | 8–11 y (n = 5) |
| L2L3 | 72.0 ± 13.4 | 55.8 ± 10.2 | 41.6 ± 1.8 | 34.2 ± 12.5 |
| L3L4 | 77.0 ± 11.2 | 48.2 ± 5.0 | 42.0 ± 9.5 | 36.0 ± 15.7 |
| L4L5 | 74.4 ± 13.3 | 54.0 ± 9.9 | 43.2 ± 14.2 | 38.2 ± 16.1 |
| L5L6 | 73.2 ± 16.0 | 55.0 ± 16.1 | 44.8 ± 9.3 | 38.8 ± 16 |
| L6S1 | 75.8 ± 11.7 | 34.5 ± 7.0 | 27.4 ± 6.8 | 21.8 ± 3.4 |
The data show that CIS and T2 mapping scores increased with age, whereas T2 time decreased.