Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimaging. 2016 Mar 18;26(5):539–544. doi: 10.1111/jon.12342

Table 1. Agreement between Axial and Coronal Transcerebellar Diameter in 2D conventional and 3D reconstructed MRI.

MRI method CCC SE 95% Confidence Interval
2D conventional 0.989 0.0029 0.981 - 0.993
3D reconstructed 0.999 0.0004 0.998 - 0.999

CCC = concordance correlation coefficient. SE = standard error.

3D reconstructed MRI had higher CCC between axial and coronal transcerebellar diameters than 2D conventional MRI (Z score = 5.676, p<0.001). The p-value corresponds to the null hypothesis that CCC between axial and coronal measurements is the same in 2D conventional and 3D reconstructed MRI. Note that 3D reconstructed MRI had a smaller standard error than 2D conventional MRI, and the 95% confidence intervals do not overlap.