Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 13;145(Pt B):254–264. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.016

Table 4.

Cognitive tasks scores most relevant in distinguishing phenotype I from phenotype II patients using LASSO.

Cognitive task feature Research domain criteria (RDOC) construct Mean beta value Beta % Comparison
AGN mean RT nonshift blocks (ms) Cognitive control 1.5111 25.09% PH2 > PH1
AGN mean RT to nonshift blocks starting with positive stimuli) (ms) Social communication 0.7858 13.05% PH2 > PH1
AGN mean RT to shift blocks starting with negative stimuli (ms) Social communication 0.7283 12.09% PH2 > PH1
AGN N commissions errors in shift blocks starting with positive stimuli Social communication -0.6200 10.29% PH1 > PH2
AGN N commissions errors in nonshift blocks starting with neutral stimuli Cognitive control -0.5027 8.35% PH1 > PH2
CGT deliberation time descending blocks (ms) Cognitive control -0.3644 6.05% PH1> PH2
CRT minimum RT (ms) Arousal 0.3037 5.04% PH2 > PH1
CGT quality of decision making Valence system 0.2990 4.96% PH2 > PH1
IED N errors during Intradimensional component Cognitive control -0.2480 4.12% PH1 > PH2
CGT deliberation time (ms) Cognitive control -0.2428 4.03% PH1 > PH2

PH1 – Phenotype I, PH2 – Phenotype II, AGN – Affective Go/No-go, CGT – Cambridge Gambling Task, CRT – Choice Reaction Time, IED – Intra/Extradimensional Set Shift, RT – Reaction time.