Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 13;145(Pt B):254–264. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.016

Table 5.

Prediction and validation results of Healthy controls, Phenotype I and Phenotype II patients. Notably, this table was generated ‘post-hoc’ – after the unsupervised machine learning step.

Feature domain Group Acc Sens Spec PPV NPV P AUC
Cognition (PH1, PH2) 0.9429 0.9211 0.9688 0.9722 0.9118 < 0.0001 0.9449
(HC, PH1) 0.8553 0.8158 0.894 0.8857 0.8293 < 0.0001 0.8553
(HC, PH2) 0.7969 0.7500 0.8438 0.8276 0.7714 < 0.0001 0.7969
FA (PH1, PH2) 0.7593 0.7600 0.7586 0.7308 0.7857 0.0001 0.7593
(HC, PH1) 0.5714 0.5517 0.5926 0.5926 0.5517 0.2802 0.5722
(HC, PH2) 0.9231 0.8800 0.9630 0.9565 0.8966 < 0.0001 0.9215
MD (PH1, PH2) 0.6481 0.6800 0.6207 0.6071 0.6923 0.0275 0.6503
(HC, PH1) 0.5714 0.5517 0.5926 0.5926 0.5517 0.2802 0.5722
(HC, PH2) 0.8654 0.8800 0.8519 0.8462 0.8846 < 0.0001 0.8659

FA- fractional anisotropy, MD- mean diffusivity, HC- healthy controls, PH1- Phenotype I, PH2- Phenotype II, Acc- Accuracy, Sens- Sensitivity, Spec- Specificity, PPV- Positive predictive values, NPV- Negative predictive values, AUC- Area under curve.