Table 5.

Summary of all the results in descending order.

Line	Experiment	Evaluation		Pre-processing	Feat. Detection				Mapping	Feat. Representation	Classifier	BoW
		SE	SP		Type	{8,1}	{16,2}	{24,3}
1	2	81.2	93.7	NLM+F	LBP	✓			Local	High	SVM	✓
2	2	75.0	93.7	NLM+F+A	LBP	✓			Local	High	SVM	✓
3	2	75.0	93.7	NLM	LBP	✓			Local	High	SVM	✓
4	2	75.0	100	NLM	LBP-TOP		✓		Local	High	SVM	✓
5	2	81.2	87.5	NLM	LBP-TOP	✓			Local	High	SVM	✓
6	2	81.2	87.5	NLM+F+A	LBP-TOP		✓		Local	High	RF	✓
7	2	81.2	81.2	NLM	LBP	✓			Local	High	RF	✓
8	3	81.2	81.2	NLM	LBP-TOP			✓	Global	Low	RF
9	2	81.2	81.2	NLM+F	LBP-TOP	✓			Local	High	SVM	✓
10	3	81.2	81.2	NLM+F+A	LBP-TOP			✓	Global	Low	GB
11	3	81.2	81.2	NLM+F	LBP-TOP			✓	Global	Low	RF
12	2	75.0	87.5	NLM	LBP	✓			Local	High	k-NN	✓
13	Lemaitre et al. [12]	75.0	87.5	NLM	LBP	✓			Local	High	RF	✓
14	Lemaitre et al. [12]	75.0	87.5	NLM	LBP-TOP		✓		Global	Low	RF
15	2	68.7	93.7	NLM	LBP	✓			Global	High	RF	✓
16	3	75	81.2	NLM+F+A	LBP-TOP			✓	Global	Low	RF
17	2	68.7	81.2	NLM	LBP-TOP		✓		Local	High	RF	✓
18	3	62.5	93.7	NLM	LBP-TOP		✓		Global	Low	SVM
19	3	68.7	87.5	NLM	LBP-TOP		✓		Global	Low	RF
20	3	68.7	81.2	NLM	LBP-TOP				Global	Low	RF
21	3	75.0	75.0	NLM	LBP-TOP				Global	Low	RF
22	3	68.7	75.0	NLM+F	LBP-TOP	✓			Global	Low	SVM
23	3	56.2	75.0	NLM	LBP			✓	Global	Low	RF
24	3	56.2	75.0	NLM+F	LBP		✓		Global	Low	k-NN
25	3	56.2	75.0	NLM+F+A	LBP		✓		Global	Low	k-NN
26	Venhuizen et al. [10]	61.5	58.8