Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 14.
Published in final edited form as: Biling (Camb Engl). 2013 Apr 4;18(1):79–89. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000126

Table 2.

Number of participants by Language use type and Language proficiency type scores.

Language proficiency type
Score 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
Language use type 0 5 5 12 4 5 0 1 32
1 4 6 1 4 1 0 0 16
2 5 3 5 7 1 0 0 21
3 5 3 1 5 3 0 0 17
4 5 1 1 0 1 1 0 9
5 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 6
6 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 5
Total 25 19 24 23 13 1 1 106

N = 106; Language use type and Language proficiency type: 0 = balanced, 6 = dominant