. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 15.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Behav. 2013 Sep;37(5):577–586. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.5.1

Table 5.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses (standardized regression weights) Predicting Tanning-Bed Use Intention in Next 3-month (N = 215) and 12-month (N = 215) Periods

	Tanning-Bed Use Intention (3-months)			Tanning-Bed Use Intention (12-months)

Variables	Step 1 β	Step 2 β	Step 3 β	Step 1 β	Step 2 β	Step 3 β
Demographics
Age	.09	.10	.11	.08	.08	.08
Female	.05	.08	.09	.03	.06	.09
White	.10	.09	.10	.08	.06	.06
Current user	.19^**	.18^**	.14^*	.21^***	.20^***	.16^**
Tanning-bed dependent	.42^***	.39^***	.37^***	.40^***	.35^***	.32^***
Advantages of Tanning		.13^*	.09		.18^**	.13^*
Perceived Vulnerability		−.10	−.07		−.10	−.08
Cognitive Rationalizations
Skeptical			−.00			−.08
Worth-it			.16^*			.24^***
Danger ubiquity			.10			.09
Adjusted R²	.27^***	.29^***	.32^***	.25^***	.31^***	.36^***
R² Change		.02^*	.04^**		.04^**	.06^***

p ≤ .05,

^**

p ≤ .01,

^***

p ≤ .001