Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 18;113(18):5047–5052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524988113

Table S4.

Metrics of phylogenetic signal for fitness effect of each introduced mutation

Phylogeny Mutation/growth rate Pagel’s λ (P value)* Blomberg’s K (P value) I, Moran (P value) Cmean, Abouheif (P value)
Core phylogeny rbs 0.197 (0.685) 0.097 (0.555) −0.043 (0.364) 0.037 (0.374)
topA 0 (1) 0.618 (0.006) 0.034 (0.224) 0.143 (0.282)
spoT 1 (0.146) 0.595 (0.018) 0.440 (0.007) 0.466 (0.007)
pykF 0.392 (0.007) 0.02 (0.667) 0.031 (0.27) 0.057 (0.299)
Growth rate 0.43 (0.024)
Accessory phylogeny rbs 0 (1) 0.508 (0.437) −0.073 (0.446) 0.01 (0.526)
topA 1 (0.371) 1.028 (0.048) 0.034 (0.258) 0.143 (0.316)
spoT 1 × 10−6 (1) 0.783 (0.143) 0.533 (0.003) 0.558 (0.002)
pykF 0 (1) 0.348 (0.649) 0.027 (0.282) 0.066 (0.275)
Growth rate 0 (1)
Biolog phylogeny rbs 0 (1) 0.678 (0.257) −0.053 (0.408) 0.002 (0.477)
topA 1 (0.281) 0.868 (0.205) 0.127 (0.15) 0.247 (0.184)
spoT 1 × 10−6 (1) 0.933 (0.120) 0.151 (0.090) 0.286 (0.066)
pykF 0 (1) 0.565 (0.339) −0.043 (0.451) −0.022 (0.506)
Growth rate 0 (1)

Pagel’s lambda tests were against a null of 0, corresponding to a lack of phylogenetic signal. Other tests compare actual data to permuted datasets.

*

P values indicate results of tests comparing observations to the null hypothesis of no phylogenetic signal. Values in bold indicate significant tests.

The value remains significant after dropping the very divergent recipient strain E1118 (belonging to clade IV; Fig. 1).