Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 2;114(12):1412–1420. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.124

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate PFS associations in the Mayo Clinic and public data sets of endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, or low-grade serous EOC patients.

  The Mayo Clinic data set (n=131)
Public rarer histological samples (n=91)
  Discovery set (n=66)
Validation set (n=65)
Public validation set (n=91)
  HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Univariate analysis
Class-1 vs Class-2 0.05 (0.01–0.24) 1.2 × 10−4 0.07 (0.01–0.49) 8.2 × 10−3 0.38 (0.21–0.69) 1.4 × 10−3
Multivariate analysis n=66
n=65
n=57
Class-1 vs Class-2 0.09 (0.02–0.42) 2.4 × 10−3 0.08 (0.009–0.77) 2.8 × 10−2 0.48 (0.22–1.05) 6.8 × 10−2
Stage (I vs III and IV) 0.15 (0.02–0.95) 4.4 × 10−2 0.35 (0.093–1.34) 0.12 1.5 × 10−8 (4.96 × 10−9–4.43 × 10−8) <2 × 10−16
Stage (II vs III and IV) 0.35 (0.11–1.17) 0.09 0.80 (0.23–2.78) 0.73 1.41 (0.42–4.74) 0.58
Debulking statusa 1.10 (0.42–2.90) 0.84 3.44 (1.35–8.76) 9.4 × 103 3.29 (1.76–6.16) 2.0 × 10−4

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; EOC=epithelial ovarian cancer; HR=hazards ratio; PFS=progression-free survival.

a

Mayo: other vs having no macroscopic disease; Public: suboptimal vs optimal.